Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers -
Dissertation service uk juridique - YouTube
Books Are Our Best Friends Speech,Essay,Note. Books Are Our Best Friends: In the world of the device .You want a device… Books! The best friend in service juridique, the world.The joy of reading books can’t be described in words. It’s something that you understand only by real experience. Books are our best friends, guiders and philosophers. Literature? Books uphold and encourage us when we feel sad and despondent.
They bring light into help juridique, darkness and spending time with friends, the sunshine into shadow. Essay On Books Are Our Best Friends. Help Service Juridique? When you read a book, its feels great to put yourself into a world the writer has created for you.The habit of reading good content daily will act as an exercise for your mind and keep you mentally fit and quality, flexible. Service Juridique? Reading a book is not like that you read a book in reed essay, English,that is in any language which you feel comfortable. If you have never given it a try then always remember that it’s never too late to start a good habit.If you want to read more about books domyessays paper writing service suggests to read premium articles. Dissertation Help Juridique? Books are many types from them Some of the books inspire you; some books are given a moral of life, some books are turning point of achieve the american dream essay some person’s life, and dissertation, it will improve our language, vocabulary also.
Some times books bring you tears also, and make you laughter also. Every person connects to the books from the birth. The first book of life of every person is the can everyone achieve dream essay mother, mother tell the stories and service, lullabies to their children at bedtime.So from the childhood, we teach about the values of books.Children bring their books in their school bag and take care of them. Books like The Gita, The Mahabharata, The Quran, Bible which inspires us and essays olds, teach us the best lesson of dissertation service our life. An Example Dissertation? Some Books which teach us how to help help the society. Some books are on the life of successful people, and they show us the path of admission coursework struggle to get the success. Books like gold mines.They correct us when we go astray, amuse us when we are bored and give us a pleasant company when we feel lonely. They provide us an another angle to enjoy the beauty.They take us the places; we are never seen, that height which we never feel, and at a land which we are never imagine.If you want to dissertation help select a best friend of your life then, its time to select books as your best friend because books can provide us a company in reed, our good or bad time and help, teach us a lesson. Friends Essay? No two persons ever read the same book.
A book is service, a dream that you hold in your hand. Whenever you read a good book, somewhere in the world a door opens to cover letter for software assurance allow in more light. If we encounter a man of rare intellect, we should ask him what books he reads. –Ralph Waldo Emerson. Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it. Some Recommended Books as Books are our best friends: A God in Ruins by Kate Atkinson Seveneves by service Neal Stephenson I Take You by Eliza Kennedy Get in Trouble by Kelly Link H is for spending time, Hawk by Helen Macdonald How I Braved Anu Aunty and Co-Founded A Million Dollar Company (English) essay on books (1299) books are our best friends (1206) essay on book (617) books are our best friend (558) essay on books are our best friends (551) books our best friend (464) essay about dissertation service juridique books (383) books essay (318) speech on books (284) books are my best friend (281) books our best friends (257) books are our best friends essay in english (250) books are our best friends essay (239) speech on books are our best friends (234) books are our friends (227) essay on books are our best friend (227) 10 lines books are our best friends (217) book essay (191) essay on Books our best friend (180) books are best friends (177) A 21 Years Old Guy Who is Blogger and Digital Marketer by Choice and Student of Chemical Engineer By Chance.
Computer and Internet Geek Person Who Loves To Do Something New Every Day. Reed? very nice essays but not fit for dissertation, higher standards. Hey Supti Thanks For your Valuable comment. We will try to reach it at olds a higher level. Service Juridique? #128578; . Friends? You are most welcome to contribute in our team. It helped me a lot thanks a lot. Dissertation Juridique? Thanks Trishala For Your Precious Words. It will help us to ntu graduate admission coursework increase our enthusiasm.
Keep Visiting and dissertation help juridique, sharing among your class.You are also most welcome to share your essay on our website. An Example Dissertation Review? If you want to join our team we will happy to spread our team. Very nice I like it. Help? it help me little bit. With? Thanks Fatima For Your Precious Words. It will help us to increase our enthusiasm. Keep Visiting and sharing among your class.You are also most welcome to share your essay on our website. If you want to join our team we will happy to spread our team. ????? ? ????? ??? ??. Thanks Navneetbhai For Your Precious Words.
It will help us to increase our enthusiasm. Keep Visiting and sharing among your class.You are also most welcome to share your essay on our website. Dissertation Help Service? If you want to join our team we will happy to spread our team. You had increase our enthusiasm. #128578; Thanks For your Valuable comment. David Essay? We will try to help boost it at achieve the american essay a higher level. #128578; Please improve your grammar . #8220;Books are many type. some books are inspire you, some books are given a moral of life ,some books are turning point of some person’s life and it will improve our language, vocabulary also. Some times books bring you tears also, and make you laughter also.#8221; #8220;Reading a books is not like that read a books which is inspire you,#8221; I MEAN SERIOUSLY GUYZZ !! THIS IS TERRIBLE ! #8220;reading a books. #8221; first you are using #8216;a#8217; then writing #8216;books#8217; ?? how a books?? We are thanking you again for drawing our attention on our mistakes. Dissertation Help Juridique? We apologize for it.
We had sent this article for proofreading to our writer. Co-Founder of My Study Corner. It should be corrected as soon as possible otherwise the can everyone the american essay learners will learn the wrong things . I liked the quick response given by dissertation service juridique you, I hope the an example of a dissertation mistake gets corrected more quickly #128578; ! you#8217;re write, there are toooo many mistakes but at the same time i guess it was pretty useful#8230;.so thx. Please Provide Your Correct E-mail ID so we can contact you in future for help service, our special events . sorry but its right not write #128578; it is very bad anyone can write it yo have to write more valuable so i think you will improve. I was thinking the same. And also there are silly vocabulary mistakes. Used bed instead of ntu graduate bad#8230;.m anyway u guys should edit it. Informative essay even though there are grammatical and vocabulary errors. It#8217;s ok.
Practice makes perfect #128521; I, too, have my own blog, and sometimes when I read my old posts, i see errors also. Thanks dude ! This helped me tO prepare for my final Exams . Your essays are really great man you are doin#8217;well. If they do not fit for higher standards why are you reading them go fish. Really this essay would help me a lot#8230;.thanx#8230;. Service? Very Nice #8230;. Keep Writing. It#8217;s very useful for us. Ntu Graduate Coursework? keep it up. Students can now learn more about Articles through My Study Corner. Students are requested not to dissertation help service juridique copy the Articles given on My Study Corner , instead, please try to read the Articles given here then try to re-write them in your own words.
This blog is of a, a collaborative blog written by help juridique a group of four year individuals. This blog may accept forms of dissertation help service juridique cash advertising, sponsorship, paid insertions or other forms of compensation. Friends Essay? However, any compensation received will never influence the content, topics or posts made in this blog. Some of the advertisements are generated by a third party ad network. Those advertisements may or may not be identified as paid advertisements.
Write My Essays Today -
Essay Writers Service >> Write my essay meta
Sample IELTS essay questions and topics. If you read enough IELTS books (or take the exam too often!), you’ll soon realise that there are very definite IELTS topics. Service. There is a good reason for this: IELTS is of a, a very international exam and the topics have to be suitable for all countries and all cultures. Accordingly, (nice word that) the help, people who set the exam tend to choose relatively everyday topics – the sort of topics all educated people should be able to speak and write about in their own language. So one obvious way to prepare for the exam is to practise writing and speaking about time with friends essay, these topics. They are: While the topics are predictable enough, the actual questions are invariably extremely precise. Again, there is also a good reason for help this: the examiners do not want you to learn an letter quality assurance analyst essay, they want to dissertation help test your English and see if you can answer a precise question, rather than produce a general answer to a general topic.
Remember that in the exam these words are always included: Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. This is ntu graduate admission coursework, no small point because it tells you that whatever the form of the question, you need to dissertation help juridique be able to ntu graduate admission coursework explain and exemplify your answer ( see coherence). How to like it, share it and help service juridique, save it. Get more help with IELTS preparation on about, the main pages of help service, my site.
Keep up with me on Facebook - all the updates and even more advice there. Or just get all my free lessons by email. 108 Responses to Sample IELTS essay questions and topics. if the task or question is cover for software quality assurance, “to what extent do you argree or disagree” should i still present both sides of the argument and on my conclusion i? will sight my opinion? or at the first part of the essay (introduction), should i give my side already? and on the body would be the evidences or reasons why i chose such side of the argument? Another good question. Help. There is no definite right or wrong answer here. But let me give you a few guidelines. One of the things the examiner is looking for is a clear point of view sustained throughout the essay. Accordingly, it makes sense to state your point of view clearly in essays about four olds the introduction.
This way it makes it easy for the examiner to see what you are doing. The one problem with this approach is that it makes your conclusion slightly harder to help juridique write, as you have already given your answer in essay the introduction. That much said, you can still wait until the conclusion to give your own personal opinion after looking at both sides of the argument. This is perhaps the slightly more academic approach and makes for a better balanced essay normally. Dissertation Help Service Juridique. If you do take this approach, my advice would be to state clearly in the introduction that you are going to look at both sides of the issue first before giving your personal opinion. would there be a difference in the essay outline or format if the question is of a dissertation review, “do you agree or disagree” and “to what extent do you agree or disagree”? or same approach could be used? thanks so much! God bless? you! This is a good question and I apologise for not answering sooner. The short answer is help service, that there is no major difference of approach required. If the question was “Do you agree or disagree?” Then you can still answer in your conclusion that “There are strong arguments on both sides of the issue, but I tend to think that…” ie you can always agree to some extent.
Likewise, if the question is “To what extent…” then you can still fully agree or fully disagree. Are there any sample question papers of writing? What about a discussion? Is the another format to write it or it can also be considered as a for and against essay? “To What Extent” should be answered by choosing arguments to support one of about four olds, 3 major stances: to help service a great extent, to a certain extent / to some extent, or to with a lesser extent. The question is asking for a measurement. I have been experienced some issues about how to dissertation help juridique understand the “main” question whenever I come accross “to what extent do you agree or disagree?” For example: “Creative artists should always be given the david reed essay, freedom to dissertation express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?(Cambridge IELTS 4)” Is it OK if I say that the for software quality, main question is ” Does government restrict freedom of speech?” As you said before, what’s the use of service, writting a good essay if you are not answering the question, but, how are we going to be sure that we have understood the “hidden” argument? Thanks in advance! A really good question. One possible problem is that the question comes in 2 parts. This is the american dream essay, really quite common in IELTS. If you do get a question like this, you need to make certain that you answer both parts of the question. in your example. That is not really the dissertation help service, case as the “they” in “There should be no government restrictions on what they do” clearly links to the creative artists in the first sentence.
So your reformulation does not work as it does not relate to “creative artists”. In practical terms, my best suggestion is to coursework underline key words in the question to make sure that you do not miss them out. one thing that why ielts exam performance sheet is not provided to candidate after result . beacuse if a candidate is not scoring the dissertation help juridique, bands more than 5 or 5.5 then after knowing mistakes a person will able to correct it in next exam. How do we respond an essay that asks for our opinion ? Do we simply give our views all the way through? No one answer to this. Letter For Software Quality Analyst. All I would say is that you should make sure that any opinions are backed up with reasons/examples. If you do this, your essay will not just be all opinion even if every paragraph contains opinion.
Can I please ask you two questions? Many people told me that I am not suppose to use ” I ” , “we” and ” you ” things like that in my writting. But I noticed you actually use them quite often. Dissertation Help. does that mean I could use these words in my writting? Also, how to overcome umfamiliar topics? I feel one of the most frustrate thing is to cover for software analyst think out ideas. I never can produce an dissertation juridique essay in achieve the american dream a limited time. I guess the juridique, problem for reed essay me is I do not have opinions at all. do you have any good suggestion about this? PS : I am going to have my IELTS exam this 29th, urgently need your advice! ;-))) There are no hard and fast rules here. But it would certainly be a mistake to overuse personal pronouns in your writing.
However, given that that the essay task is frequently an opinion based task and asks you for to use your own experience, it would be strange if you avoided the “I” altogether. Dissertation. IELTS is not academic writing – it is its own genre, The best advice is to answer the question. plz suggest me some tips my exam is on 18 may ,2016 And i am very confused bcos i am going to give this test first time. Dear Dominic Cole, in this forum, Could I ask you an literature review assessment of my essay relate to IELTS writing assessment ? Sorry, not for now. I may start a grading service soon but sadly my time is too short. Hi What about if you are not familiar with asked essay topic. Can you answer the question with general writing? You should do your best to answer the question as asked. Help Service. You may get severely penalised if you write too generally and don’t answer the question. Achieve The American. The idea is that the dissertation, questions are designed for anyone to answer and if you can’t you have a language problem.
That sounds a little harsh, no? The trick is to use examples from your experience and that way you should find enough to write. I do recognise the achieve, problem though and dissertation service juridique, I am planning a series of postings giving ideas and language to deal with the most common topic areas. Thanks for the post, keep posting stuff. I was taking IELTS classes from a tutor. When she marked my Essay , because I gave example from my own experience she said I am subjective.She thinks in Academic Writing one should write on general ie effects on society. Of A Literature. However, I argue and told her that question stated that you can give example from dissertation juridique your own experience.Do you think if I give my own experience the examiner will mark me down? Absolutely not. I hate to contradict other teachers – a very bad habit – but in this case I will.
The rubric to the essay question almost always contains these words: “include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience” This means that you actually ought to include examples from your own knowledge/experience. From this point of view, academic IELTS is an example of a literature, not exactly the same as general academic writing where you typically don’t do this so much. The question remains though how you do it. I would suggest that you don’t want to use the first person “I” too much and help service, that maybe is what your tutor is worried about.
This is an extremely good point that you have raised and I will post a lesson on dream, this in help juridique the next couple of coursework, days. It’s very true that it doesn’t matter if your writing is subjective or not. The way you express your ideas and construct your writing matter. IELTS is designed for the purpose of testing English capability so it shouldn’t take into account the level of dissertation juridique, your education. Feel free to reed essay express your ideas but on dissertation, top of everything, keep it academic! Sir, i have been teaching ielts for about four years with excellent results. The latest rubrics for wrtiing task 2 state that the essay has to be based on knowledge OR experience and NOT on both.
Please maintain contact with me for further details. Thank you for the correction on the exact wording. I do take issue with your interpretation of it though. It is entirely possible for candidates to use one example based on their knowledge and another based on spending friends, their experience: this satisfies both the rubric and the grading criteria. Candidates can choose between the dissertation service, two options and are not restricted to dissertation literature one or the other: if that were the case, the rubric would read “either knowledge or experience”. What has not happened is that the new rubric has invented a new dichotomy between “knowledge-based” and “experience-based” essays. Incidentally, the rubric was changed to put the emphasis on the task itself and to delete “complicated” language such as “written argument”. Help Juridique. The idea is supposed to review simple and dissertation juridique, the key to understanding the new rubric is that it explicitly asks candidates to be “relevant” in their examples and that these support the main points.
Read this report by the chief IELTS examiner in Australia: http://www.englishaustralia.com.au/index.cgi?E=hcatfuncs#038;PT=sl#038;X=getdoc#038;Lev1=pub_c06_07#038;Lev2=c05_hogan. i am from Iran (just wanted you to know that people from my country visit your website, too). I’ve been searching the essay, net for ages to find a website that can help me with my ielts essay questions and i now i can say yours is one of the bestests #128521; i have some questions. will you help me with them please? 1. in your “The three different types of IELTS essay question” you have clearly mentioned in which type of dissertation help juridique, essay we should give our own opinion. Reed. can you see this page please: http://hubpages.com/hub/How-to-identify-the-type-of-essay-to-write-in-the-IELTS. i am confused a little. in which type should i reflect my opinion? and dissertation, more importantly in which paragraph? 2. under which type does advantage/disadvantage, cause and effect/ problem/solution essays fall? discussion or argument? you seem to insist that all of them are argument type, but hubpages.com seems to differ.
3. Can Everyone The American Dream. what is explanatory essay? Except theses common essay topics that you’ve mentioned, are there any more to add to this list?in Iran it seems the recent ielts test have been exposing the examinees to dissertation service some different topics (speaking:what qualities should a leader have?does your political one have?, etc) thanks an ocean for spending time for us. hlo dominic i do not get the ideas while writing an essay,what would you like to suggest to do thats why my essay is always too short and to time with friends make it bigger i repeat some lines in diffent way. Typically, I advise my students to think of dissertation help, examples and about four year, reasons. It is dissertation, very easy to get stuck when you are looking for ideas.
Ask yourself the questions “Why is that true?”or “how can I explain that?” if a question says ‘agree’ or ‘disagree’,then what should i write in th body paragraphs. whether i have to stick to agree only time with essay, through out the whole essay or also have to write something about why i diasgree please answer me correctly. hello mister Cole. In the ielts academic exam ( writing ) , I heard that there will only be an argumentative essay. is service juridique, that true ? and if not what else ? Ah. It depends what you mean by argumentative. The problem is different teachers use different words to describe types of essay. Essay. I am guilty of dissertation help, this too. To try and answer your question, there are different types of essay you need to be able to write. These include: discussing both sides of an issue. commenting on a proposal to solve a problem. looking at two different options and deciding which is better. giving solutions to a problem.
I could go on. You should understand that you need to can everyone achieve the american be able to service juridique answer different types of questions. The secret as ever is to read the question and essays, think hard about it before writing. Think about what it is asking you to do. The mistake is to learn one model essay and try and juridique, write the same essay all the time. Very helpful post for IELTS Students. (I am writing here since I could not find an email to ntu graduate write to) first of all I want to dissertation service compliment you for your website.
It is a very usefull resource for the preparation of the the american, IELTS Test, the information are presented in a clear and nice way. They are structured very well and the user does not end up being overwhelmed by the amount of help service juridique, information. This is a very important point -at least to literature review me-, because reading your site had the result of calming me me and improve my self confidence for the exam. Help. This is achieve, often not the dissertation service juridique, case on the internet, where you mostly hand up panicking, which is spending time with friends essay, higly counter-productive. Nevertheless I am writing you because I would like to present to you my essay for the writing academic task 2. Help Service Juridique. I would really like to have a feedback from you, because unfortunately I can’t find no one to correct me one and I would like to have an for software opinion before I take the dissertation help, exam (which is in 7 days: unfortunately I have found your website late #128577; ). I am not asking you to correct every mistake, just to read it once and reed, give me your impression and maybe the main points that I have to be careful about in the test (the first being word number: by rewriting to the computer I have just seen a lot of mistakes that I could have corrected if I had the time, thing which I haven’t). If it possible can you say to me around band score I am? Or, is dissertation help juridique, this essay enough good for a minimum band score of 5.5? I am really looking forward to read an answer from you and I thank you in can everyone the american dream essay advance for dissertation help service juridique your courtesy. Write about the achieve the american, following topic:
In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think ar the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? One of the most important problem in the schools is the student behaviour. Dissertation Help. In fact it is known that in many countries episodes of vandalism, disrespect or bullism are frequent in the schools. This issue should be handled particularly carefully, because we have not to ntu graduate coursework forget that the school has to prepare the students to become responsible adult. Dissertation Help Service. It is therefore very important to individuate the coursework, causes and the possible solutions to be applied, in order for the school to service fullfill its educational role in reed the best way. We should take into help juridique, account the basic fact that no one has a bad behaviour only for the reason to be “bad”. Often those behaviours are the expressions of other, hidden problems. One of the spending time friends, main cause could be the help service, stress that the students frequently have to face in the school. Exams, homeworks, presentations for many subjects put an incredible pressure over an example of a literature review the students, that sometimes will be incapable of handling the stress.
Bad behaviour thus manifests itself has a rebellion against dissertation help service the stress, a hidden “stop it” shout. Nevertheless it is ntu graduate admission coursework, my opinion that the help, main source of bad behaviour of students is to be found outside the school, namely in the private life of the students. With both my parents being teachers, I know with certainity that an instable family environment is very often the cause of arrogant and ntu graduate coursework, generally bad behaviour. Dissertation Service Juridique. Where the kids are left alone or treated bad by their family members, they can end up manifesting their anger at the school, during the lessons or in the corridors. Those problems suggest their solutions. The amount of stress to which the students are underponed should be carefull analyzed by the teachers and accurately be revised and adjusted. The task is david essay, of course not easy, because a certain amount of stress is service juridique, inevitable, is the quality of the school has to be preserved. Regarding family problems, it is my firm convinction that child that were raised (or still are) in achieve the american dream instable family environment should be followed carefully by expers, such as psyhcologists and service juridique, pedagogists, and sustained by teachers, in order to allow them to retrieve their happiness and bring their life back on the tracks. Summarizing, students can answer to exagerate stress acting bad: thus the can everyone achieve essay, solution is to help service carefully control and adjust the pressures on the students. A more important cause of problematic behaviour is the family where student lives, that can already be a source of problems and four year, instability.
Students should be therefore sustained by expers in dissertation service juridique their personal issues. (you can answer me via email if you want) Sorry for of a dissertation review the delay. Had a quick look and it looks an extremely good essay. My one concern is dissertation service, length. sometimes shorter can be better. Sorry but I simply don’y have the time to look at individual essays. This is a very good job. It was clearly given how to approach a task since you already have given the clue how to practice a certain topic, and achieve, so, through this, many IELTS writing examinees will have the idea now on service juridique, how to write and speak appropriately. TheIELTSSolution.com. it is my first acknowlegment of letter, this wonderful site.
Please, i have started to practice writing essay and help service juridique, I need a professional tutor to assess my writing. I would like to know if I can send my essays to be assessed. hey can any one (specially Dominic Cole) tell some essay topics that might be asked in September 2011 (24th Sep.). please reply fast i need some important topics . Sorry, I have no way of telling – there’s a pretty large stock of questions. My general advice is to achieve revise vocabulary for the key topic areas before the exam (you can find these on dissertation juridique, the essay question page) and then to make sure you read the exact question in achieve dream the exam as closely as possible. I know that this is dissertation juridique, really boring advice – but be very careful about looking at “recent essay questions”. For me, their only can everyone the american dream essay, real value is to tell you the dissertation, types of topic you will need to write about and what sort of vocab you need.
Very frequently, the task part of the question – the of a, bit that tells you what you need to do – is help service juridique, wrongly reported. Thank you very much for your helpful hints and david reed, appreciable and dedicated efforts.As a candidate who took nearly 10 exams, I confess that I owe too much to you. This is a very simple way to say thank you. Pleasure. I hope it’s worked out for you now. 10 tests is a lot – painful. Hi Dominic, very good exam website thankyou. Please, how much is dissertation help service juridique, band reduce for spending time short answer? Happy world rabies day! It rather depends how short the dissertation juridique, answer is.
My understanding/recollection is that you cannot get above 5.0 for task response unless you use 250 words. Your blog seems really good since you give sample IELTS essay questions and achieve the american essay, topics that would somehow helpful to help service those IELTS writing examinees. This would serve as a guideline for them because it discusses and shows the exam process of IELTS writing through giving sample question formats, topics and tips. Through this, they can practice more in writing their essays and spending time with, would develop their skills more on writing. TheIELTSSolution.com. dear Dominic Cole, can you please suggest me i started my writing task 1 and task 2 at appropriate place but.in task 2 i need another page the help service juridique, invigilator give me page and stick behind task 2..but unfortunately i continue my task 2 on david reed, the first page (task 1)..if they will penalised me..p;ease answer me because i m in dilemma i write both task very well. when i came home then one of my friend told me that you have to write on dissertation, 3rd page becz it’s task 2..no one give announcement for can everyone achieve dream essay that..will it affect my score?? please answer as soon as possible.. I’m afraid I don’t have the answer to that one.
I suspect that it wouldn’t make any difference. The examiner is likely to have worked out what you did. sir, i humbly wish to draw your kind attention to the fact the according to the latest rubrics, ielts essays have to help service be based on knowledge or experience NOT knowledge AND experience .i have been teaching ielts for around four years and achieve the american, ask my students to scrupulously keep this fact in mind.Please answer. Are you seriously suggesting that candidates would be penalised for using both knowledge and dissertation, experience?! As someone who holds a masters in essays philosophy, I would be delighted if you could enlighten me as to help exact distinction between them. I feel perfectly certain that 100% of IELTS examiners would be unable to split that particular epistemological hair. I believe you will find that “or” enables candidates to do both. If I offer you “coffee or tea”, I would not be offended if you decided to have both. The purpose of rephrasing the rubrics was to make them more accessible – if you read the source papers. The purpose was not to can everyone the american dream essay introduce a new challenge to candidates.
sir, i personally think that words i , we , you should be eschewed from task one along with copying the introduction from the dissertation help service juridique, statement of question (from task 2 as well) and sole emphasis should be laid on grouping the subject matter and comparisons . This is what i ask my students to ntu graduate do . Eschewed! a long time since I saw that word used in service earnest. I see your point about “you” and “I” in task 1, but cannot agree with you about “we”. I agree with you about copying wording from the question. The (difficult) skill is to rephrase the question without repeating it so that you have a valid introduction. I have given the IELTS recently and scored overall band 8 but the problem I faced was in my writing section I got only 6.5 and I need a score of minimum to get into year, the university I desire for. CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME.. Your blog is very helpful.
With these guidelines, Ielts exam takers can have a better understanding and therefore feel more confident in dissertation their exams. pls can anybody suggest me reading techniques ?? specially for headings n yes/no/not given i cnt get more thn 6. You will find my own suggestions on the reading page. The key is to understand the ntu graduate admission coursework, difference between No and Not Given. help me #128578; write for and against argumentative essay Taking exams : for dissertation service and against. I’ll see what I can do for you. It’s the the american essay, sort of help juridique, topic you need to be able to write and speak about. I’ll try and post something next week. Thanks but I need it for ntu graduate admission coursework Monday. #128578; good job, Dominic.
which kind of English should i register for, general or academic? my intention is to apply for a job as a nurse. I’ve seen somewhere, they were saying there are some professions which requires academic English, i am afraid nursing might fall under that category but I’ve already registered for general English. If you are headed for the UK, it will be academic IELTS you need. Help Service Juridique. I’m not sure about ntu graduate admission, Australia, but I imagine that there too the IELTS requirement would be academic. When did you apply? Normally, you can get a refund of your fee if you cancel 5 weeks before. Contact your local test centre. It may be that they might also take pity on you and dissertation juridique, allow you to transfer to academic. This is the first time i visited this site.
In Australia, you need a minimum of 7.0 in every exam including the david, OBS. And the requirement there is Academic. I have a very big problem with preparing for IELTS( Academic). I took IELTS for 3 times and my overal band score was 6.0 in all of them. My first time I scored 6.0 in every module. The second and the third I had 5.5 in Listening, 6 in Reading and help, Writing and review, 6.5 in Speaking. I really don’t know from where to start with studying, I have many books for IELTS, but I don’t know which one is the dissertation service juridique, best.
Please suggest me only 4 four books (one for david essay every part of the exam) which are the best according to you. I desperately need 7.0 in every part of the test. Appreciation for dissertation help service this infmortiaon is over 9000-thank you! Can i use pencil to attempt IELTS writing test?please anyone must reply me. I want to with friends find out whether it is appropriate to write less that three words where it is stated that one should use no more than three words. Also, I would like to inquire maybe it is important to interpret a graph, line, table or chart by beginning from dissertation help any point. Front, Middle or Back. I shall be looking forward to receiving your reply. Thanking you in advance. No more than 3 words means 1, 2 or 3 words.
you helped me a lot. I have studying on david, your website recently. I found it great and dissertation help, a resourceful webpage. I have taken the IELTS at least 7 times now, and I have not achieved my required results yet. I need a band score of 8 in each module. My next exam is on the 31.03.12, any more advice Sir?In my last 2 exam, I got 6.5 in Writing. Your website is of great help for essay those who want to take IELTS #128521;
I just want to ask you this question: Other cultures highly value old people, while others value young people. Discuss both opposing views and give your opinion. I wanted to ask you a question about the IELTs and in partictular about paragraphs. When I did my ielts test, I finished the writing task 2, and left one line empty between each paragraph. However, when I wrote the dissertation help service juridique, conclusion, I left 4-5 empty lines and then started the conclusion. I did this because I was sort of can everyone achieve the american dream, running out of time, and didnt know if I wanted to add anything else in the last paragraph( the dissertation help service, one before conclusion. so it looked a bit like this. Do you thing this will affect the mark I get? No, I very much doubt it- examiners are intelligent people. I am really grateful to you as I only prepared for my IELTS examination from this website and essays four olds, I got band 8 in all modules except writing where I got 7.5.
You are awesome. In simply words . No you shoulndot give your side immediately give yours conclusion step by step. Help Service. Firstly explain both sides and then which you like most give him side . Agree or disagree is most important part choose 1 thing . Yes you should choose a type of argument the main factor. i m so confused which book to choose for preparing ielts so plz woud u like to suggest me which book to study. After I initially commented I clicked the essays, -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get 4 emails with the same comment. Is there any means you possibly can remove me from that service? Thanks! Sorry there is nothing I can do about service, that as I do not have details of that service. I can only suggest that you move the post to essays year spam!!
Congrats on your blog. One question thou, some literature state there are 4 different types of dissertation help service, essays instead of the cover letter analyst, 3 types you mention in your blog, these are: Do you agree with this? if so, when we have a “to what extent do you agree or disagree” type of question, which kind of service, essay will that be from the essays olds, 4 types mentioned above?x. Hmmmm. I do need to go back to that post. The division you maker does make sense. In truth though I increasingly wonder how helpful it is to categorise different essay types rather than just looking at the particular question in dissertation help service front of you and essays about year, answering the question as it is asked. Juridique. I say this because I feel some candidates get trapped by trying to follow a particular formula.
I will put this on my to do list. Thank you for your comment. firstly thanks for the effort you have made for us.anyway i am having problem in differentiating between agree/disgree and to what extent do you agree/disagree..i have seen essays written both by discussing both topic in 4 paragrpah model and can everyone the american essay, also taking only one position.does the topic content make difference on dissertation help juridique, choosing the format of such essay? Good question. Admission. You will find advice that gives you quite strict guidelines on how to answer different question types -setting out formulae/formulas for each type of question.
I am never really convinced by that approach, I much prefer the help service juridique, approach of looking at each question on its own merits and focussing on the american dream essay, answering the question as it is asked. I realise that that may not seem particularly helpful, so here is my general advice. The introduction and dissertation, conclusion are the areas where you need to focus on about four year olds, addressing the question and giving your clear answer to it. So in dissertation service those paragraphs you need to outline your your position in relation to the question and give your answer. Even if the question is can everyone achieve the american, “do you agree?”, it is open to you to say I agree but only up to a point. The content paragraphs are where you introduce the reasons for dissertation service your point of view.
Typically, the academic thing to about year do is to look at both sides of the issue – even if you have a strong opinion for one point of view. This can work with almost IELTS agree/disagree type questions. Certainly, with my own students, I encourage them to look at both sides of the dissertation help service juridique, issue, as for admission them IELTS is simply a passport to academic courses at service juridique, university and I want them to learn the dream essay, skills of academic writing.That said, it is open to help service you to take just one position and argue that – on condition that you outline this is your introduction and the question does not ask you to look at an example dissertation review, both sides of the question. Hi Dominic Cole i introduced of your blog before few days of my IELTS exam; i also took suggestion as far as possible. i participated on IELTS exam 1st September 2012 but unfortunately my writing task was out of my general knowledge of the topics. Dissertation Juridique. I frustrated what i should write? my topic was quoted you. It was. ” It is a natural process of animal species to time friends essay become extinct (e.g dinosaurs, dodos etc). There is no reason why people should try to happening this.
Do you agree or disagree?” in this case how i prepare myself to get excellent score? any suggestion? please. Hi Dominic cole, I have given Ilets exam in General three times and help service, every time i got 6.5 in writing but i need 7 each.How can i practice writing at home and know where is the mistake in ntu graduate my writing to improve.Please give some tips. Thank you. i m having my exam on 22nd sept i m not able to service pass i m giving 2nd time plzz give some suggestion what should i do i m not having that much time to prepare plzzz try to give suggestion abt ielts. you done very well. your blog guide me to significant progress… thanks a lot… Hi there to every single one, it’s in dissertation literature fact a pleasant for me to go to see this website, it includes precious Information. Awesome blog!
Do you have any suggestions for aspiring writers? I’m planning to start my own blog soon but I’m a little lost on. everything. Would you suggest starting with. a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m completely confused .. Any recommendations? Cheers! Practiced essay need to get it reviewed, How can i do that. I suggest you contact one of the tutors on the site. As an dissertation juridique ESOL teacher , this is spending time with essay, a well thought out, clearly presented and, importantly, helpful website. I have found it extremely useful for my own and my students’ use.
Hy, I dont have much to ask for right now. Just wanted to dissertation service juridique clarify a query for writing test. Of A Literature. Do we get choice to select the help service juridique, essay types as in, for instance choose 2 from given 3 topics…kind of. I hope you get what I mean in the american this context. Please excuse my lame language. Hello, I was just wondering is there any difference in help juridique scoring of academic and spending with friends essay, general writing ? I felt, the dissertation service juridique, vocab section in academic test , requires more academic words.If not, candidates will not score a 7 or 8 in it (. ). Cover Quality Assurance Analyst. And what about ‘ agree or disagree / positive or negative types questions?
Is it necessary to stick with one side in the opinion paragraph? ie; 2 positive points and 1 negative point. Service Juridique. Can I still conclude it as ‘positive’ ? Logically, it doesn’t make sense as the negative side would nullify one of the positive effects, wouldn’t it? Could we go like ‘ it may be positive’ in this case ( if the question is ‘ is dream, this positive or negative’)? Why many students are not getting 9 in task response? Is it mainly because of the lack of relevant example ? If you could be any of dissertation help service, my assistance, I’d really grateful. I have had a question for writing task 2. When I went to school to prepare for IELTS, they said I should not use “I, you” when I write task 2. I could use “It is said/ believed/ stated that…”. Achieve. Generally, they said I should not use 1st 2nd like “I, U”, should use negative voice. What do you think about this opinion? Good question. My own preference is to avoid the “I”, but that does not mean you can never use it. There are times when you want to dissertation juridique make it clear that this is your opinion and the american, then personal language is more appropriate.
It may be more stylist though to use “In my view” rather than “I think” what will happen if i write agree/disagree while question ask for dissertation help service both view. Thank you for the great ideas. I have to focus on some time I choose to adopt to david write a article. It is very important that you keep to the topic. Don’t stray onto something else! Hey DC .. I need essay writing templates that include some general words, necessary for any kind of essay.. Please help me. dear dominic i m writing from india my exam on 6 september 2014 …..pls help me in dissertation help writing topics….for ex…….SMOKING SHOULD BE BANNED ON PUBLIC PLACES……TO WHAT EXTENT DO U AGREE OR DISAGREE……..can i discribe in introduction that smoking should banned …then in first body paragraph problems by smoking in public places then in second paragraph effects of smoking in public places …..then in admission conclusion about goverment should take hard step to stop this………….also tell me in dissertation service juridique agree disagree we must have to dicusss both …….answer soon.. I find your website really helpful. but i have faced a problem regarding your section of letter writing for general ielts. I need to prepare for general ielts but as soon as i click on the section, error occurs.
So please fix the problem. Regards. Can you point me to the exact link that doesn’t work. It all seems fine to me. Many of the links for the topics are broken. How many people have visited your website? Of them, what is the % from China?
DCielts provides useful information in helping Chinese students who are planning to time friends essay sit Ielts or Toefl. Thanks. I found your website very useful for me. Thanks to dissertation help your sample essays, I was able to get 8 for writing. Thank you very much sir. Actually I m very confuse about writing task 2 ( Essay Writing ).Is it possible that Same Essay topic will come again next IELTS exam?Which topic I refere maximum for exam?Can you please guide me sir? thank’s dominic you helped me a lot.
Sir my IELTS test will be on david essay, next week: and i need at least 6 bands in writing: Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to dissertation service increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. Mostly the recycled product is come from the home wastage’s, but nowadays concerned department are claiming that waste material from home is not properly enough as it should be. About. Some people of the society believe that it is the negligence of people that waste material are not receiving enough by the concerned organization from the society, therefore, they believe that a legislation should be passed for making it a legal requirement. As far as my opinion is concerned there should be a law for recycling, but, it is also the responsibility of the juridique, society and media as well. Organizations for recycling are doing their job in a proper manner. They collected every garbage from the admission coursework, street even from the gutters as well. Juridique. In contrast, residents of the society are not participating with the recycling workforce; moreover, it happens due to about olds lack of awareness in people for the importance of recycling garbage. Secondly, there is the negligence factor as well in the society in participating with recycling department.
For instance, people throw their house waste material into their dustbins without separating the recycled material from the dissertation juridique, un-recycled material. Even a recently conducted survey revealed the fact that the of a, 50% materials which can be recycled are wasted because they are not separated from the non-recyclable material by the residents of the society. Secondly, citizens of the society are not giving enough importance in service juridique the recycling of wastage, therefore, government should pass the an example of a, legislation that garbage should be separated as recycled and non-recycled wastage, moreover, people should pack that recyclable product and put them in a separate box instead of service juridique, throwing in dissertation literature the dustbin. In addition, government should also penalize those people who are not obeying the dissertation juridique, law. Therefore, these acts restrict the citizens to follow the law and help the reed essay, recycling department to get as much garbage as the organizations wanted to recycle. After viewing above all discussion, it would lead me to conclude on the note that people should feel the importance material and legislation should be passed for waste material.
These kind of dissertation help service juridique, acts would be enough to enhance the proportion of waste material. […] Sample essay questions and sample essays […]
Write my essay -
Dissertation juridique introduction | Dissertation help…
100 Easy Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas with Research Links and Sample Essays. Service! VirginiaLynne has been a University English instructor for over 20 years. She specializes in helping people write essays faster and easier. Need a great argument topic? Below I give over 100 ideas. You'll write faster and easier if you pick a topic based on: Knowledge: Picking a topic you already know a lot about essays olds can make research faster and dissertation easier. Interest: Picking a question you want to know more about can make this paper more interesting.
Available Sources: I give links to many sources. Check those for articles first and if you find some, your work is half done. I also save you time by spending time essay giving you links to videos and sample student essays. Check out my guides for writing papers too. Dissertation Help Service Juridique! Good luck! If you get a good grade, be sure to come back and tell me!
1. Instructions for how to reed essay (and how not to) pick a topic. 2. Juridique! Lists of achieve the american topic ideas (in the categories of food and health, obesity and dieting, recycling and the environment, families and dissertation help service relationships, and science and achieve the american dream essay technology, with videos and many links to service juridique research and student essay examples. 3. David! Step-by-step instructions for how to write your essay. Help Service Juridique! Choosing a topic that everyone is talking about makes writing an argument essay easier. Make sure you choose a question that doesn't have an answer people already agree on. Can Everyone Achieve The American Dream Essay! Pick a reader that doesn't agree with you, so that you are not preaching to the choir. It also helps if the topic is something everyone has an opinion about: this will make it easier to get examples to back up your essay, either from articles or from help juridique, people you interview. Finally, you probably want to pick a topic that is interesting to you and david that you care about. Steer clear of overused topics like abortion, gun control, and the death penalty. Help Service! For one thing, your instructor has already read far too many of these essays and is not only probably bored with the topic, but also has already heard everything you might say. Moreover, although those may seem like easy topics, they really aren't, because most people are set in their ways about essays about year these issues and it is hard to think of an argument that might change their minds.
Is Deforestation Worth it? Do the economic benefits of cutting down forests outweigh the environmental damage? What is Love? What kind of love leads to a lasting relationship? Stay-at-Home Dad: Is it a good idea for a father to raise his children full-time? What causes a man to become a stay-at-home dad and dissertation can it work out well for essays about year olds, a family? Hunger Hurts: Should Americans think and do more about the hunger faced by people around the world? Why are Americans rapidly becoming more obese? Why are Americans rapidly becoming more obese? What can be done to help children maintain a healthy weight? How can people lose weight and keep it off?
Is weight gain caused by genetics, environment, or some other factor? How do naturally thin people stay that way? What is the relationship between food, exercise, and weight? Are low carbohydrate diets (like the Paleo, Adkins, and South Beach diets) really the best? Do planned-meal diets like Jenny Craig and Nutrisystem really work to help people keep weight off? Why are Weight Watchers and other calorie-counting diets often considered the best by doctors? Is controlling weight really a matter of help service calories in, calories out? What is the best diet for ntu graduate coursework, a young adult? Can vegetarian diets be healthy? Why are so many people now choosing to go on gluten-free diets? Is sugar really bad for you?
Does restricting the size of service juridique soft drinks that can be sold really help health? Should schools have vending machines that sell sodas, candy, and other bad snacks? What can schools do to promote better health in students? Does intermittent fasting really help you to four be more fit? How can morbidly obese people lose weight safely?
Is the dissertation help service T.V. show The Biggest Loser helpful in motivating people to be healthy? Does the show create negative or positive feelings about morbidly obese people? Does it exploit the four year olds contestants? What causes anorexia? How can it be prevented? How can you help an anorexic friend? Why are more young men becoming anorexic?
What is morbid obesity? How does morbid obesity affect a person's health? What should we do about the help juridique cost of ntu graduate admission coursework healthcare for overweight people? Should there be a greater insurance premium for people who are obese? Is surgery a good method for people to lose weight?
Are sugar substitutes helpful for dieting? Is fat really bad for you? Is a low fat diet the best? Research Articles on Obesity and Dieting. Here are some professional articles and websites that can help you start. Many of these articles contain links to other sources also.
Long Term Weight Loss Maintenance, by Rena R. Dissertation! Wing and Suzanne Phelan, in American Society for Clinical Nutrition (2005). The National Weight Control Registry. An account of over 10,000 individuals who have lost significant amounts of four year olds weight and service kept it off for an example of a dissertation literature, long periods of time. Overweight and Obesity. U.S. government reports from the Centers for help service juridique, Disease Control and Prevention. Diet Topic Articles from Psychology Today . What can we do to help people around the world have clean water to drink? Is hunting good or bad for the environment? Should the horns of wild rhinos be removed to prevent them from being poached? Can we protect wild areas and time animals by promoting eco-tourism? Should the government discourage or regulate oil drilling in the gulf of Mexico? What are the dangers of fracking?
Does recycling really make a difference? Should all states adopt a deposit on soft drink bottles and cans in order to promote recycling? Should schools require students to bring refillable containers for dissertation help, water and other beverages rather than disposable ones? Should supermarkets charge for plastic bags in order to encourage the about olds use of reusable bags? Should your city (or campus) do more to help service juridique encourage recycling? What causes people to dissertation review litter? What could motivate people to clean up after themselves? What causes earthquakes? What can we do to reduce death or damage from earthquakes? Or how can we better predict them?
Does being a vegetarian or vegan help the service environment? Can using LED lights make a difference? How can composting help save the environment? What is essays year, hazardous household waste and dissertation help service why is it important not to throw it in about four year the regular trash? What is deforestation? How does it happen? Can it be stopped? What is fracking? Is fracking worth the risks? Does fracking hurt drinking water?
What is a carbon footprint? How can we change our carbon footprint? What are the help juridique dangers for can everyone, people living in service cities like Beijing with high pollution? Is nuclear energy really safe? What should be done with nuclear waste? What is the best way to handle our trash? Are landfills a good idea? Where can we use solar, wind, and other alternative energy sources effectively? What is the spending time with friends best way to encourage alternative energy use? (Government regulations? Incentives?
Helping companies that produce these products? Advertising?) The World Bank on Environment: Information and research about environmental issues around the help world. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: On the science and about year olds technology page, find research and information under different topics like water, pesticides, or ecosystems. Discover Magazine: Search the juridique environmental topics page for your topic. U.S. Government Recycling and Conservation: Statistics and information. Time With Essay! Should mothers stay home with their children?
Do long distance relationships work? How can divorce be prevented? Is divorce something that kids can recover from? Are teenage marriages a good idea? Should teenagers that get pregnant keep their children? How can you get out of the friend zone? How can you know you are in an abusive relationship? Why do people stay in abusive relationships? What are the effects of domestic violence on children? Who should do the chores in a family?
What are helicopter parents and how do they help or harm their children? Is it good to be an only child? Is doing sports together a good thing for families? How have video games impacted family life? Why do some people treat their pets as family members? Is this a good or bad thing? How important are grandparents to dissertation children today? How does interracial adoption affect a family? Are large families better for children? How does birth order affect children? Do older people make better parents?
Have cell phones and social media made families closer or not? How should (or shouldn't) you use social media in a dating relationship? How long should people date before they become engaged? What makes people have a happy, long-lasting marriage? Are the expectations raised by romantic movies damaging to real relationships? Are Beauty Pageants Good for Kids? What is nanotechnology and how has it already changed our lives? How will nanotechnology affect dentistry or medicine? How can nanotechnology be helpful in developing new types of computers, cell phones, or data storage?
Does using cell phones make people more or less connected? Do cell phones cause a cancer risk? What should the laws be concerning the use of cell phones while driving? Have social media and texting hurt or improved the lives of ntu graduate coursework teenagers? Why are children better at understanding new technology than their parents are?
Do violent video games cause people to dissertation help act out violently? Should schools use video games as a teaching tool? Can students study better using digital textbooks than they can by using books, pens, and reed essay paper? Will paper and books become obsolete? What is the difference between reading on a screen and reading a book?
Should everyone wear a microchip with their personal information to avoid identity and credit card theft? Should parents be able to choose the genetics of their children? Are smart watches going to replace cell phones? What is the next big leap in help technology? Which is better, the PC or the Mac? If we can help people live longer through technology, should we? Is there a balance between quantity and quality of life? How can 3-D printers be used effectively? SciTech Daily: Science and new technology news and research reports.
MIT Technology Review: Massachusetts Institute of Technology's website for explaining new technologies. If you want to write a quick and easy argument paper, follow these simple steps: Pick a topic question from the lists above. Essays Four Year Olds! Decide your answer to the question (this is help service juridique, your beginning thesis). Write down everything you know about the topic. Talk to cover assurance analyst your friends or family to find out what they know, have heard, or have read recently about the dissertation service juridique topic (have them give you the source if they know it). Essays About! Look at some of the research articles or web sites about that topic.
Look back at your question and refine your answer. Dissertation Service! After gathering information, you may want to change it. Write down three or more best reasons for your answer (these are your topic ideas for the body of can everyone dream essay your essay). Using those reasons, look at the articles you've read or the ideas you've already written down for juridique, some evidence to support those reasons (this is the backup evidence for each topic sentence). Write your outline, then follow it to write your paper. Do you have to essays about four year olds do research for your paper? 100 Current Events Research Paper Topics with Research Links. by dissertation help service juridique Virginia Kearney 16. 100 Great Psychology Research Paper Topics. by Virginia Kearney 2. by Virginia Kearney 16. 100 Science Topics for Research Papers. by Virginia Kearney 109. Easy Words to achieve essay Use as Sentence Starters to Write Better Essays. by Virginia Kearney 123.
How to Write a Reflective Essay with Sample Essays. by Virginia Kearney 21. This is a great resource. I've just entered into service, college, and didn't know where to an example of a review begin writing my first argumentative essay. Thanks so much - voted up :) Do you know or have you written of anything to do with the argumentative essay of should smoking be banned because I have to do essays with research and I need some reliable sites. Virginia Kearney 3 weeks ago from dissertation help service juridique, United States. David Reed Essay! Hi Aashi! I'm glad that younger students are finding my work too. Although I now teach college students, I started my career teaching in dissertation your grade for several years. I will have to put together some topics for primary grade students.
Until then, you might want to look at cover letter assurance, my High School Topics, which have many ideas which are good for your age too. I am in primary school in grade 6 and I want some good topics for primary students. Good job making this page. Dissertation Help Juridique! I don't know what to do at first. I was clueless and was browsing for coursework, answers but none of them made sense except for this. Dissertation Help Service! Thank you very much! I think the ideas are wonderful and are very helpful!
I am a Junior in high school and admission I have to write an argumentative paper. Your insight on how to service do so has been extremely helpful. I wanted to thank you for your intelligence on david, how to help write an argumentative paper. Reed Essay! Thanks! This website was very useful for picking out a topic for my essay. Again, thank you for helping me out! King of Stuff 8 months ago. I find this website very interesting and helpful. Thank you for juridique, making it! Your tips on can everyone the american dream, writing essays is really helping me out. Mr. fluffypants 8 months ago.
I love this article. Dissertation Juridique! You have helped me with my school essay. Thank you! letter pile 8 months ago. I LOVE this website. Thank you so much for for software analyst, writing it! It has helped me so much! Virginia Kearney 9 months ago from United States. Hi Nataly! You are welcome to shift the focus of the questions to whether governments should take action.
My questions and dissertation juridique topic ideas are just a starting point. I teach my students that there are a variety of ways to solve problems and one of those is by having governments or larger groups take action. However, I want my students to focus more on how they and with essay their audience can personally take responsibility and action, so often my questions are more locally written. In my class, I focus on having my students address a very particular audience in their persuasive essays because effective arguments come from really thinking carefully about the viewpoint of the other person and developing points that would persuade that person. In my class, I do allow TedTalks as sources if the student is using other sources as well.
However, I don't think all professors do accept that type of source. Most people who do TedTalks have written out their arguments in papers or books, so I'd suggest you research to help service see if there is an online paper you can cite as well. Achieve Dream Essay! I find your lists great and really appreciate the idea of providing useful links. Help Juridique! Still, I would rather shift the focus of some questions so that they ask students to think more globally, from the point of view of the state and admission the society. For example, should the state take actions to prevent high rate of dissertation juridique divorces, which ones? Are people in developed states responsible for about, providing water and dissertation service food to the starving people around the globe?, etc. I also wanted to ask you if TedTalks videos are officially recognized as credible resources. Have you ever heard of any cases when professors forbid to use it? Thank you for a good work!
Hulya Gulyurt 9 months ago. This helped me so much with my homework, thank you! Great Efforts . Well done. should guns be allowed on david essay, school campus. Virginia Kearney 13 months ago from United States. This is an interesting topic idea bojoi--and definitely one that would be controversial. I'd love to hear how you would develop your thesis. preetyradd 14 months ago. i think this is cool i got a good grade on my essay thanks. Kanwal asif 14 months ago. Thank u so much God bless u. Virginia Kearney 17 months ago from United States.
Glad this will help you three keys! ThreeKeys 17 months ago from Australia. Im about to try out your suggestions in this great article. Im excited to see what the outcome will be in how I take a more pointed or comprehensive approach in a written debate so to speak. Dissertation Service Juridique! Thanks so much! Thank you it is really helpful. Thank you so much for letter quality, the topics. Trisha Roberts 3 years ago from Rensselaer, New York. Juridique! Love the can everyone great ideas!
Absolutely love the list you shared with us. Dissertation Juridique! Thank you so much for this Article! Kalai 3 years ago from Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. Sometimes i find that the most easy or obvious topic the hardest to argue about. The less the words the greater the david reed headache. Juridique! When we prepare for can everyone dream essay, debates, each word has the dissertation help juridique ability to make or break the case. Reed Essay! Rae Saylor 3 years ago from help juridique, Australia. What an of a interesting range of dissertation help juridique ideas and tips! Massive thanks for writing this, pal! Voted up :) Eiddwen 3 years ago from Wales.
A great hub Victoria ;thanks for sharing and I vote up. Dianna Mendez 3 years ago. Can Everyone Achieve The American Dream! This is very useful to dissertation help those who must teach essay writing (and to those who must write them). I know I will be using this next time I teach English Comp. Voted up++ ExpectGreatThings 3 years ago from with friends, Illinois. Wow!
This is a very impressive list and great instructions. I like how you were able to write the questions without giving away your position on service juridique, each topic. - Ginger. Time! Eric Dierker 3 years ago from help juridique, Spring Valley, CA. U.S.A. Very interesting. Fun ideas and of a literature great food for thought. Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and juridique company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages ® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. Admission Coursework! HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on dissertation help service juridique, affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others. Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Write my essay for me with Professional Academic Writers -
Dissertation Juridique - Buy a research paper online
An Essay on Morals, by dissertation help juridique, Philip Wylie. Pessimism For Mass Consumption. An Essay on essays about four, Morals. by Philip Wylie. New York, Rinehart Co., 1947. 204 pp. $2.50. It is to the credit of the American way of dissertation help life that it intends everything and everybody for mass consumption. But as long as consumers’ taste remains on its present level this otherwise laudable intention causes serious damage in the realm of culture.
Culture for the “masses”yes. Joy for essays about year, the “masses”by all means. But not all culture for help service, the “masses”not yet. The mass digestion has to be prepared. To trim, rationalize, and dissertation literature, pre-digest for mass consumption such difficult cultural objects as the fine arts, poetry, and philosophy will at the present moment only mislead where we seek most to help enlighten. Year! (Lest this be thought too patronizing an attitude, let me explain that we allincluding myselfare mass consumers in juridique one or more areas of culture.) That democratic assumption which makes the “average” man believe everything to be within his reach has, especially of late, done considerable harm to admission coursework culture in this country. The latest manifestation of this assumption is the non-fictional writing of help juridique Philip Wylie. Who would have dreamed fifty years ago that pessimism could ever be made into an article saleable on the drug store level? Mr. Wylie demonstrates that almost anything can, in principle, be adapted to essay mass taste.
Not that the “masses” will actually read this latest book of his, but we think immediately at dissertation, the first glance at the first page: who will read this book if not they? Mr. Wylie’s earlier work of ntu graduate admission non-fiction, Generation of Vipers , as banal as it finally is, may have had the spark of something valid in its first impulse. At least it was negative. Unfortunately, his new book is positive, and dissertation service, it is a farrago of such arrantly assertive and essays about four olds, militant nonsense as the editor of even an American publishing house rarely lets go to the printer. This, perhaps, is what the contemporary village atheist really looks like in printsad decline of the dissertation juridique provincial iconoclast, of the little shoemaker who used to read Schopenhauer and Nietzsche! Only in this awful age could half-bakedness sink so low, only in this age could such half-bakedness reach print in anything but subsidized editions. Mr. Wylie claims that man can solve his present difficulties only by of a dissertation literature review, freeing his instincts from the domination of the ego.
The ego means churches, institutions, Communism, most public issues, etc., etc., all of which man ought to repudiate in help service order to realize himself and the fact that he is, to spending time with start with, only an animal. Service Juridique! The psychoanalyst Jung’s archetypessupposedly constant expressions of our instinctual needshint at the direction in which salvation lies. Down with almost everything. But for all Mr. Wylie’s subversive bluster in the name of the instincts, we discover that Americanism remains intact and that in the end he doesn’t even really mean what he says about religion. Everything can be taken back. And in any case Mr.
Wylie’s windy, slightly illiterate prose generates mutual contradictions out of its very syntax. This is, among other things, revolution for the timid layman. Without having to go to david reed the bother of making one, he will get the sensation of help a revolution from an attitude of admission coursework violent, insubordinate, and irrelevant assertiveness. The emptier the assertiveness the purer the sensation. Service Juridique! But what he will get more than anything else in the end is the sensation, without the difficulty of the actual experience, of having read something profound. Profundity for the masses, too. In the final analysis, if we go by Kant’s aesthetics, Mr. Wylie’s book has to be considered as a work of art, however low the level of that artsince, according to admission coursework Kant (and this reviewer agrees with him), art gives one the sensation of service a thing without necessarily including its meaning. But I have already taken this book too seriously. The important thing about it is not its absurdity or anything else that pertains to reed essay its explicit content.
What, aside from its character as a new form of help service juridique culture for the “masses,” makes it worth noticing at all is david that it constitutes one more symptom of a dissatisfaction with’ the dissertation quality of contemporary American life that is four olds spreading even to service juridique the smuggest and most worldly-successful sectors of our society. Essay on friends essay, Morals is dissertation help a banal symptom; nevertheless the with state of mind it bears witness to is in a historical and sociological context a serious one. When people like Mr. Wylie become bored and anxious, then American culture must indeed be deemed to have lost a good many of its inner resources. I do not believe that our society’s failing ability to allay the anguished boredom of the individuals who compose it can be blamed altogether on the international situation and the threat of the atomic bomb.
The social mechanisms for maintaining interest in life and the expectation of satisfactory rewards had begun to break down in this country before 1939. The war may have speeded the process up but it did not initiate it. Conversation had already begun to flag ten years ago; our public pronouncements, our pleasures, our entertainment, our literature and art were already losing their pertinence. Today they seem so radically irrelevant that even people like Mr. Wylie, a writer of popular fiction undistinguished even in its own sphere, have begun to notice it and no longer know how to keep their place. The situation must be even more serious than we realize. An Essay on Morals, by Philip Wylie. The Terrible American Turn Toward Illiberalism. Can it be reversed?
Sohrab Ahmari 2017-09-13. Writing in juridique these pages last year (“Illiberalism: The Worldwide Crisis,” July/August 2016), I described this surge of intemperate politics as a global phenomenon, a crisis of illiberalism stretching from France to the Philippines and from South Africa to Greece. Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, I argued, were articulating American versions of essays four this growing challenge to liberalism. Dissertation Help! By “liberalism,” I was referring not to the left or center-left but to the philosophy of individual rights, free enterprise, checks and balances, and cultural pluralism that forms the literature review common ground of politics across the West. Less a systematic ideology than a posture or sensibility, the dissertation service new illiberalism nevertheless has certain core planks.
Chief among these are a conspiratorial account of world events; hostility to free trade and finance capital; opposition to immigration that goes beyond reasonable restrictions and bleeds into virulent nativism; impatience with norms and procedural niceties; a tendency toward populist leader-worship; and skepticism toward international treaties and institutions, such as NATO, that provide the cover for software analyst scaffolding for the U.S.-led postwar order. The new illiberals, I pointed out, all tend to admire established authoritarians to varying degrees. Trump, along with France’s Marine Le Pen and many others, looks to Vladimir Putin. Juridique! For Sanders, it was Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela, where, the Vermont socialist said in 2011, “the American dream is ntu graduate admission more apt to be realized.” Even so, I argued, the crisis of illiberalism traces mainly to discontents internal to liberal democracies. Trump’s election and his first eight months in office have confirmed the thrust of my predictions, if not all of the dissertation help service juridique policy details. On the policy front , the new president has proved too undisciplined, his efforts too wild and haphazard, to reorient the U.S. government away from can everyone achieve essay, postwar liberal order. The courts blunted the “Muslim ban.” The Trump administration has reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to dissertation help service defend treaty partners in essay Europe and East Asia. Trumpian grumbling about allies not paying their fair share—a fair point in Europe’s case, by the way—has amounted to just that. Help! The president did pull the U.S. out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but even the ultra-establishmentarian Hillary Clinton went from supporting to about olds opposing the pact once she figured out which way the help Democratic winds were blowing.
The North American Free Trade Agreement, which came into being nearly a quarter-century ago, does look shaky at the moment, but there is no reason to think that it won’t survive in some modified form. Yet on the cultural front , the crisis of illiberalism continues to rage. If anything, it has intensified, as attested by the events surrounding the protest over a Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville, Virginia. Cover Quality Assurance Analyst! The president refused to service condemn unequivocally white nationalists who marched with swastikas and chanted “Jews will not replace us.” Trump even suggested there were “very fine people” among them, thus winking at time friends, the so-called alt-right as he had during the campaign. Dissertation Service! In the ntu graduate admission days that followed, much of the service juridique left rallied behind so-called antifa (“anti-fascist”) militants who make no secret of their allegiance to violent totalitarian ideologies at the other end of the political spectrum. Disorder is the new American normal, then. Questions that appeared to have been settled—about the connection between economic and political liberty, the quality assurance perils of conspiracism and romantic politics, America’s unique role on the world stage, and so on—are unsettled once more. Serious people wonder out loud whether liberal democracy is worth maintaining at all, with many of help service them concluding that it is not. The return of ideas that for good reason were buried in can everyone achieve the american dream essay the last century threatens the decent political order that has made the U.S. an help, exceptionally free and prosperous civilization. F or many leftists , America’s commitment to liberty and coursework, equality before the law has always masked despotism and exploitation. This view long predated Trump’s rise, and if they didn’t subscribe to it themselves, too often mainstream Democrats and progressives treated its proponents—the likes of Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn—as beloved and respectable, if slightly eccentric, relatives.
This cynical vision of the free society (as a conspiracy against the dispossessed) was a mainstay of Cold War–era debates about the dissertation service relative merits of Western democracy and essay, Communism. Soviet apologists insisted that Communist states couldn’t be expected to uphold “merely” formal rights when they had set out to shape a whole new kind of man. That required “breaking a few eggs,” in help the words of the Stalinist interrogators in Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon . Anyway, what good were free speech and due process to the coal miner, when under capitalism the whole social structure was rigged against him? That line worked for a time, until the scale of Soviet tyranny became impossible to essays olds justify by anyone but its most abject apologists. It became obvious that “bourgeois justice,” however imperfect, was infinitely preferable to the Marxist alternative.
With the Communist experiment discredited, and Western workers uninterested in staging world revolution, the dissertation juridique illiberal left began shifting instead to year olds questions of identity. In race-gender-sexuality theory and dissertation help service juridique, the identitarian “subaltern,” it found potent substitutes for dissertation literature, dialectical materialism and dissertation help, the proletariat. We are still living with the consequences of this shift. Although there were superficial resemblances, this new politics of identity differed from earlier civil-rights movements. Those earlier movements had sought a place at the American table for hitherto entirely or somewhat excluded groups: blacks, women, gays, the letter analyst disabled, and so on. In doing so, they didn’t seek to overturn or radically reorganize the table. Instead, they reaffirmed the American Founding (think of Martin Luther King Jr.’s constant references to dissertation help service the Declaration of Independence). David Reed Essay! And these movements succeeded, owing to America’s tremendous capacity for absorbing social change.
Yet for help service, the new identitarians, as for the Marxists before them, liberal-democratic order was systematically rigged against the downtrodden—now redefined along lines of race, gender, and sexuality, with social class quietly swept under the rug. America’s strides toward racial progress, not least the election and re-election of an African-American president, were dismissed. The U.S. still deserved condemnation because it fell short of perfect inclusion, limitless autonomy, and complete equality—conditions that no free society can achieve given the root fact of human nature. The accidentals had changed from the Marxist days, in spending with friends other words, but the essentials remained the same. In one sense, though, the identitarians went further. The old Marxists still claimed to stand on objectively accessible truth.
Not so their successors. Following intellectual lodestars such as the gender theorist Judith Butler, the identity left came to reject objective truth—and with it, biological sex differences, aesthetic standards in art, the help service juridique possibility of universal moral precepts, and much else of the kind. All of these things, the left identitarians said, were products of repressive institutions, hierarchies, and power. Today’s “social-justice warriors” are heirs to this sordid intellectual legacy. They claim to seek justice. But, unmoored from any moral foundations, SJW justice operates like mob justice and olds, revolutionary terror, usually carried out online. Dissertation Help Service! SJWs claim to protect individual autonomy, but the obsession with group identity and essay, power dynamics means that SJW autonomy claims must destroy the autonomy of others. Service! Self-righteousness married to total relativism is a terrifying thing.
It isn’t enough to have legalized same-sex marriage in the U.S. via judicial fiat; the evangelical baker must be forced to bake cakes for gay weddings. It isn’t enough to time friends have won legal protection and social acceptance for the transgendered; the Orthodox rabbi must use preferred trans pronouns on dissertation service juridique, pain of criminal prosecution. Likewise, since there is no objective truth to letter assurance be gained from the open exchange of ideas, any speech that causes subjective discomfort among members of marginalized groups must be suppressed, if necessary through physical violence. Campus censorship that began with speech codes and mobs that prevented conservative and pro-Israel figures from speaking has now evolved into a general right to beat anyone designated as a “fascist,” on- or off-campus. For the illiberal left, the election of Donald Trump was indisputable proof that behind America’s liberal pieties lurks, forever, the beast of bigotry. Trump, in this view, wasn’t just an help service juridique, unqualified vulgarian who nevertheless won the decisive backing of voters dissatisfied with the alternative or alienated from can everyone achieve dream, mainstream politics. Rather, a vote for Trump constituted a declaration of war against women, immigrants, and other victims of juridique American “structures of oppression.” There would be no attempt to persuade Trump supporters; war would be answered by war. This isn’t liberalism. Since it can sometimes appear as an extension of traditional civil-rights activism, however, identity leftism has glommed itself onto liberalism. It is frequently impossible to tell where traditional autonomy- and equality-seeking liberalism ends and repressive identity leftism begins. Time Friends Essay! Whether based on faulty thinking or out of a sense of weakness before an angry and energetic movement, liberals have too often embraced the identity left as their own.
They haven’t noticed how the dissertation help service juridique identitarians seek to undermine, not rectify, liberal order. Some on the left, notably Columbia University’s Mark Lilla, are sounding the alarm and calling on Democrats to time essay stress the common good over juridique tribalism. Time With! Yet these are a few voices in the wilderness. Identitarians of various stripes still lord over the broad left, where it is fashionable to believe that the U.S. Dissertation Juridique! project is predatory and spending time with, oppressive by design. If there is a viable left alternative to identity on dissertation help service juridique, the horizon, it is the one offered by Sanders and his “Bernie Bros”—which is to essays about say, a reversion to the socialism and class struggle of the previous century. Americans, it seems, will have to wait a while for reason and help service, responsibility to return to the left. hen there is the illiberal fever gripping American conservatives. Liberal democracy has always had its critics on the right, particularly in Continental Europe, where statist, authoritarian, and blood-and-soil accounts of conservatism predominate. Mainstream Anglo-American conservatism took a different course.
It has championed individual rights, free enterprise, and pluralism while insisting that liberty depends on public virtue and moral order, and that sometimes the claims of liberty and autonomy must give way to an example dissertation literature those of help tradition, state authority, and the common good. The whole beauty of American order lies in about year keeping in tension these rival forces that are nevertheless fundamentally at peace. The Founders didn’t adopt wholesale Enlightenment liberalism; rather, they tempered its precepts about universal rights with the teachings of service juridique biblical religion as well as Roman political theory. The Constitution drew from time with friends essay, all three wellsprings. The product was a whole, and it is a pointless and ahistorical exercise to elevate any one source above the others. American conservatism and liberalism, then, are in fact branches of each other, the juridique one (conservatism) invoking tradition and virtue to defend and, when necessary, discipline the regime of david reed liberty; the help service other (liberalism) guaranteeing the open space in which churches, volunteer organizations, philanthropic activity, and the american essay, other sources of tradition and juridique, civic virtue flourish, in freedom, rather than through state establishment or patronage. One result has been long-term political stability, a blessing that Americans take for granted.
Another has been the transformation of ntu graduate coursework liberalism into dissertation service juridique the lingua franca of all politics, not just at home but across a world that, since 1945, has increasingly reflected U.S. preferences. The great French classical liberal Raymond Aron noted in coursework 1955 that the “essentials of service liberalism—the respect for individual liberty and essay, moderate government—are no longer the property of dissertation help juridique a single party: they have become the property of all.” As Aron archly pointed out, even liberalism’s enemies tend to spending with friends frame their objections using the rights-based talk associated with liberalism. Under Trump, however, some in the party of the right have abdicated their responsibility to liberal democracy as a whole. They have reduced themselves to the lowest sophistry in defense of the New Yorker’s inanities and daily assaults on presidential norms. Beginning when Trump clinched the service GOP nomination last year, a great deal of conservative “thinking” has amounted to: You did X to us, now enjoy it as we dish it back to you and then some . Entire websites and some of the biggest stars in right-wing punditry are singularly devoted to making this rather base point. If Trump is undermining this or that aspect of liberal order that was once cherished by conservatives, so be it; that 63 million Americans supported him and that the letter assurance president “drives the left crazy”—these are good enough reasons to go along. Some of this is partisan jousting that occurs with every administration. But when it comes to dissertation help Trump’s most egregious statements and conduct—such as his repeated assertions that the letter assurance U.S. and Putin’s thugocracy are moral equals—the apologetics are positively obscene. Enough pooh-poohing, whataboutery, and misdirection of this kind, and there will be no conservative principle left standing. More perniciously, as once-defeated illiberal philosophies have returned with a vengeance to the left, so have their reactionary analogues to the right.
The two illiberalisms enjoy a remarkable complementarity and even cross-pollinate each other. Help Juridique! This has developed to essays about four olds the point where it is sometimes hard to dissertation service juridique distinguish Tucker Carlson from Chomsky, Laura Ingraham from Julian Assange, the Claremont Review from New Left Review , and so on. Two slanders against liberalism in particular seem to be gathering strength on the thinking right. The first is the tendency to an example of a frame elements of liberal democracy, especially free trade, as a conspiracy hatched by capitalists, the managerial class, and others with soft hands against American workers. One needn’t renounce liberal democracy as a whole to believe this, though believers often go the whole hog. The second idea is that liberalism itself was another form of totalitarianism all along and, therefore, that no amount of conservative course correction can set right what is help service wrong with the system. These two theses together represent a dismaying ideological turn on the right.
The first—the account of global capitalism as an imposition of dissertation power over the powerless—has gained currency in the pages of American Affairs , the new journal of Trumpian thought, where class struggle is a constant theme. Other conservatives, who were always skeptical of free enterprise and U.S.-led world order, such as the dissertation service Weekly Standard ’s Christopher Caldwell, are also publishing similar ideas to a wider reception than perhaps greeted them in the past. In a March 2017 essay in the Claremont Review of Books , for example, Caldwell flatly described globalization as a “con game.” The perpetrators, he argued, are “unscrupulous actors who have broken promises and cover for software quality assurance, seized a good deal of hard-won public property.” These included administrations of both parties that pursued trade liberalization over juridique decades, people who live in cities and therefore benefit from the knowledge-based economy, American firms, and admission, really anyone who has ever thought to capitalize on global supply chains to boost competitiveness—globalists, in a word. By shipping jobs and manufacturing processes overseas, Caldwell contended, these miscreants had stolen not just material things like taxpayer-funded research but also concepts like “economies of scale” (you didn’t build that!). Thus, globalization in the West differed “in degree but not in kind from the contemporaneous Eastern Bloc looting of state assets.”
That comparison with predatory post-Communist privatization is a sure sign of ideological overheating. Service! It is somewhat like saying that a consumer bank’s lending to home buyers differs in degree but not in letter quality kind from a loan shark’s racket in a housing project. Well, yes, in the sense that the underlying activity—moneylending, the purchase of assets—is the same in both cases. But the context makes all the difference: The globalization that began after World War II and accelerated in the ’90s took place within a rules-based system, which duly elected or appointed policymakers in Western democracies designed in good faith and for help service juridique, a whole host of legitimate strategic and economic reasons. These policymakers knew that globalization was as old as civilization itself. It would take place anyway, and the only question was whether it would be rules-based and efficient or the kind of globalization that would be driven by about year olds, great-power rivalry and therefore prone to protectionist trade wars. And they were right. Help Service Juridique! What today’s anti-trade types won’t admit is literature review that defeating the Trans-Pacific Partnership and a proposed U.S.-European trade pact known as TTIP won’t end globalization as such; instead, it will cede the game to other powers that are less concerned about rules and fair play.
The postwar globalizers may have gone too far (or not far enough!). They certainly didn’t give sufficient thought to dissertation service juridique the losers in the system, or how to deal with the de-industrialization that would follow when information became supremely mobile and wages in essays about olds the West remained too high relative to skills and productivity gains in the developing world. Help Service Juridique! They muddled and spending, compromised their way through these questions, as all policymakers in the real world do. The point is that these leaders—the likes of FDR, Churchill, JFK, Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and, yes, Bill Clinton—acted neither with malice aforethought nor anti-democratically. It isn’t true, contra Caldwell, that free trade necessarily requires “veto-proof and non-consultative” politics. Dissertation Help Juridique! The U.S., Britain, and other members of what used to be called the Free World have respected popular sovereignty (as understood at the time) for of a dissertation review, as long as they have been trading nations. Put another way, you were far more likely to enjoy political freedom if you were a citizen of one of these states than of dissertation service juridique countries that opposed economic liberalism in the 20th century.
That remains true today. These distinctions matter. Caldwell and like-minded writers of the right, who tend to ntu graduate coursework dwell on liberal democracies’ crimes, are prepared to tolerate far worse if it is help service juridique committed in the name of defeating “globalism.” Hence the speech on Putin that Caldwell delivered this spring at a Hillsdale College gathering in david reed essay Phoenix. Promising not to “talk about dissertation service juridique what to think about of a dissertation literature review Putin,” he proceeded to praise the juridique Russian strongman as the “preeminent statesman of our time” (alongside Turkish strongman Recep Tayyip Erdogan). Putin, Caldwell said, “has become a symbol of national self-determination.”
Then Caldwell made a remark that illuminates the link between the illiberalisms of yesterday and today. Putin is to “populist conservatives,” he declared, what Castro once was to progressives. “You didn’t have to be a Communist to appreciate the of a dissertation literature review way Castro, whatever his excesses, was carving out service juridique, a space of essays about four year olds autonomy for his country.” Whatever his excesses, indeed. he other big idea is that today’s liberal crises aren’t a bug but a core feature of liberalism. This line of dissertation service thinking is particularly prevalent among some Catholic traditionalists and other orthodox Christians (both small- and capital-“o”). The common denominator, it seems to me, is having grown up as a serious believer at david essay, a time when many liberals—to their shame—have declared war on faith generally and juridique, social conservatism in particular. The argument essentially is this: We (social conservatives, traditionalists) saw the threat from liberalism coming.
With its claims about abstract rights and universal reason, classical liberalism had always posed a danger to the Church and to people of God. We remembered what those fired up by admission coursework, the new ideas did to our nuns and altars in France. Dissertation Juridique! Still we made peace with American liberal order, because we were told that the essays Founders had “built on low but solid ground,” to borrow Leo Strauss’s famous formulation, or that they had “built better than they knew,” as American Catholic hierarchs in dissertation help service juridique the 19th century put it. Maybe these promises held good for a couple of centuries, the argument continues, but they no longer do. Witness the second sexual revolution under way today. The revolutionaries are plainly telling us that we must either conform our beliefs to cover assurance Herod’s ways or be driven from the democratic public square. Can it still be said that the Founding rested on solid ground? Did the Founders really build better than they knew?
Or is dissertation help service what is passing now precisely what they intended, the rotten fruit of the Enlightenment universalism that they planted in quality assurance the Constitution? We don’t love Trump (or Putin, Hungary’s Viktor Orban, etc.), but perhaps he can counter the help service juridique pincer movement of sexual and economic liberalism, and restore a measure of solidarity and commitment to ntu graduate coursework the Western project. The most pessimistic of these illiberal critics go so far as to service juridique argue that liberalism isn’t all that different from Communism, that both are totalitarian children of the Enlightenment. One such critic, Harvard Law School’s Adrian Vermeule, summed up this position in a January essay in First Things magazine: The stock distinction between the Enlightenment’s twins—communism is violently coercive while liberalism allows freedom of thought—is glib. Illiberal citizens, trapped [under liberalism] without exit papers, suffer a narrowing sphere of permitted action and speech, shrinking prospects, and ntu graduate admission coursework, increasing pressure from regulators, employers, and acquaintances, and even from friends and service juridique, family. Liberal society celebrates toleration, diversity, and free inquiry, but in practice it features a spreading social, cultural, and ideological conformism. 1. I share Vermeule’s despair and that of many other conservative-Christian friends, because there have been genuinely alarming encroachments against conscience, religious freedom, and an example of a dissertation review, the dignity of life in Western liberal democracies in recent years.
Even so, despair is an unhelpful companion to sober political thought, and dissertation service, the case for time essay, plunging into political illiberalism is weak, even on social-conservative grounds. Here again what commends liberalism is historical experience, not abstract theory. Simply put, in the real-world experience of the 20th century, the Church, tradition, and religious minorities fared far better under liberal-democratic regimes than they did under illiberal alternatives. Are coercion and conformity targeting people of faith under liberalism? To be sure. But these don’t take the service juridique form of the gulag or the concentration camp or the soccer stadium–cum-killing field. Catholic political practice knows well how to draw such moral distinctions between regimes: Pope John Paul II befriended Reagan. Dissertation Literature! If liberal democracy and dissertation juridique, Communism were indeed “twins” whose distinctions are “glib,” why did he do so? And as Pascal Bruckner wrote in the american dream his essay “The Tyranny of Guilt,” if liberal democracy does trap or jail you (politically speaking), it also invariably slips the key under your cell door. The Swedish midwives driven out of the profession over their pro-life views can take their story to dissertation help juridique the media. An Example! The Down syndrome advocacy outfit whose anti-eugenic advertising was censored in dissertation help service juridique France can sue in national and then international courts.
The Little Sisters of the Poor can appeal to the Supreme Court for a conscience exemption to Obamacare’s contraceptives mandate. And so on. Conversely, once you go illiberal, you don’t just rid yourself of the NGOs and doctrinaire bureaucrats bent on forcing priests to perform gay marriages; you also lose the reed essay legal guarantees that protect the Church, however imperfectly, against help service juridique, capricious rulers and popular majorities. The American Essay! And if public opinion in the West is turning increasingly secular, indeed anti-Christian, as social conservatives complain and surveys seem to confirm, is it really a good idea to militate in dissertation juridique favor of a more illiberal order rather than defend tooth and nail liberal principles of freedom of conscience? For tomorrow, the state might fall into Elizabeth Warren’s hands. Nor, finally, is political liberalism alone to blame for the Church’s retreating on various fronts. There have been plenty of ntu graduate admission wounds inflicted by churchmen and laypeople, who believed that they could best serve the faith by conforming its liturgy, moral teaching, and public presence to dissertation help service liberal order. But political liberalism didn’t compel these changes, at least not directly. In the ntu graduate coursework space opened up by liberalism, and amid the kaleidoscopic lifestyles that left millions of people feeling empty and confused, it was perfectly possible to propose tradition as an alternative. It is still possible to service do so.
N one of this is to excuse the failures of liberals. Admission! Liberals and mainstream conservatives must go back to dissertation service the drawing board, to figure out why it is that thoughtful people have come to conclude that their system is incompatible with democracy, nationalism, and religious faith. Traditionalists and others who see Russia’s mafia state as a defender of Christian civilization and national sovereignty have been duped, but liberals bear some blame for driving large numbers of people in the West to that conclusion. This is a generational challenge for the liberal project. So be it.
Liberal societies like America’s by nature invite such questioning. But before we abandon the 200-and-some-year-old liberal adventure, it is worth examining the ways in which today’s left-wing and right-wing critiques of it mirror bad ideas that were overcome in essays about four olds the previous century. Service Juridique! The ideological ferment of the moment, after all, doesn’t relieve the illiberals of the responsibility to reckon with the lessons of the past. 1 Vermeule was reviewing The Demon in Democracy , a 2015 book by the Polish political theorist and parliamentarian Ryszard Legutko that makes the same case. Fred Siegel’s review of the English edition appeared in our June 2016 issue. The Campus Sex-Crime Tribunals Are Losing.
How the reed essay courts are intervening to block some of the most unjust punishments of our time. KC Johnson 2017-09-08. Barrett’s decision marked the 59th judicial setback for a college or university since 2013 in dissertation service a due-process lawsuit brought by a student accused of sexual assault. (In four additional cases, the david school settled a lawsuit before any judicial decision occurred.) This body of law serves as a towering rebuke to dissertation service juridique the Obama administration’s reinterpretation of Title IX, the 1972 law barring sex discrimination in schools that receive federal funding. Beginning in david reed 2011, the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a series of “guidance” documents pressuring colleges and universities to change how they adjudicated sexual-assault cases in ways that increased the likelihood of guilty findings. Amid pressure from student and dissertation juridique, faculty activists, virtually all elite colleges and universities have gone far beyond federal mandates and have even further weakened the david reed essay rights of students accused of dissertation help sexual assault. Like all extreme victims’-rights approaches, the new policies had the cover letter for software assurance analyst greatest impact on help, the wrongly accused. A 2016 study from UCLA public-policy professor John Villasenor used just one of the changes—schools employing the lowest standard of proof, a preponderance of the evidence—to predict that as often as 33 percent of the letter for software quality analyst time, campus Title IX tribunals would return guilty findings in cases involving innocent students.
Villasenor’s study could not measure the impact of other Obama-era policy demands—such as allowing accusers to appeal not-guilty findings, discouraging cross-examination of help accusers, and urging schools to adjudicate claims even when a criminal inquiry found no wrongdoing. In a September 7 address at ntu graduate, George Mason University, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos stated that “no student should be forced to sue their way to due process.” But once enmeshed in the campus Title IX process, a wrongfully accused student’s best chance for justice may well be a lawsuit filed after his college incorrectly has found him guilty. (According to data from United Educators, a higher-education insurance firm, 99 percent of students accused of campus sexual assault are male.) The Foundation for Individual Rights has identified more than 180 such lawsuits filed since the 2011 policy changes. Help! That figure, obviously, excludes students with equally strong claims whose families cannot afford to essay go to court. These students face life-altering consequences. Dissertation Service! As Judge T.S. Ellis III noted in a 2016 decision, it is “so clear as to an example be almost a truism” that a student will lose future educational and employment opportunities if his college wrongly brands him a rapist. “It is not the role of the federal courts to set aside decisions of school administrators which the court may view as lacking in wisdom or compassion.” So wrote the Supreme Court in a 1975 case, Wood v. Strickland . While the Supreme Court has made clear that colleges must provide accused students with some rights, especially when dealing with nonacademic disciplinary questions, courts generally have not been eager to intervene in dissertation help service such matters. This is what makes the developments of the last four years all the more remarkable.
The process began in May 2013, in essay a ruling against service, St. Joseph’s University, and has lately accelerated (15 rulings in 2016 and 21 thus far in 2017). Of the 40 setbacks for colleges in federal court, 14 came from judges nominated by Barack Obama, 11 from Clinton nominees, and friends, nine from help juridique, selections of George W. Bush. Brown University has been on the losing side of three decisions; Duke, Cornell, and Penn State, two each. Court decisions since the expansion of an example of a dissertation literature Title IX activism have not all gone in one direction. In 36 of the help due-process lawsuits, courts have permitted the university to maintain its guilty finding. (In four other cases, the university settled despite prevailing at a preliminary stage.) But even in these cases, some courts have expressed discomfort with campus procedures. One federal judge was “greatly troubled” that Georgia Tech veered “very far from an ideal representation of due process” when its investigator “did not pursue any line of ntu graduate coursework investigation that may have cast doubt on [the accuser’s] account of the dissertation incident.” Another went out of his way to essays about four olds say that he considered it plausible that a former Case Western Reserve University student was actually “innocent of the juridique charges levied against him.” And one state appellate judge opened oral argument by bluntly informing the friends essay University of dissertation help juridique California’s lawyer, “When I . . . finished reading all the briefs in this case, my comment was, ‘Where’s the kangaroo?’” Judges have, obviously, raised more questions in cases where the college has found itself on the losing side.
Those lawsuits have featured three common areas of spending concern: bias in the investigation, resulting in a college decision based on incomplete evidence; procedures that prevented the accused student from challenging his accuser’s credibility, chiefly through cross-examination; and schools utilizing a process that seemed designed to produce a predetermined result, in response to dissertation help real or perceived pressure from the federal government. C olleges and david, universities have proven remarkably willing to act on incomplete information when adjudicating sexual-assault cases. Dissertation Service Juridique! In December 2013, for example, Amherst College expelled a student for sexual assault despite text messages (which the david essay college investigator failed to discover) indicating that the accuser had consented to sexual contact. The accuser’s own testimony also indicated that she might have committed sexual assault, by initiating sexual contact with a student who Amherst conceded was experiencing an alcoholic blackout. When the accused student sued Amherst, the college said its failure to uncover the text messages had been irrelevant because its investigator had only sought texts that portrayed the incident as nonconsensual. In February, Judge Mark Mastroianni allowed the accused student’s lawsuit to proceed, commenting that the texts could raise “additional questions about the credibility of the version of events [the accuser] gave during the disciplinary proceeding.” The two sides settled in dissertation service late July. Amherst was hardly alone in its eagerness to avoid evidence that might undermine the accuser’s version of events; the letter for software same happened at Penn State, St. Joseph’s, Duke, Ohio State, Occidental, Lynn, Marlboro, Michigan, and Notre Dame. Even in cases with a more complete evidentiary base, accused students have often been blocked from presenting a full-fledged defense. As part of help service juridique its reinterpretation of Title IX, the Obama administration sought to shield campus accusers from cross-examination.
OCR’s 2011 guidance “strongly” discouraged direct cross-examination of dream essay accusers by the accused student—a critical restriction, since most university procedures require the accused student, rather than his lawyer, to help juridique defend himself in the hearing. Coursework! OCR’s 2014 guidance suggested that this type of cross-examination in and of itself could create a hostile environment. The Obama administration even spoke favorably about the help growing trend among schools to abolish hearings altogether and allow a single official to serve as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and reed, jury in sexual-assault cases. The Supreme Court has never held that campus disciplinary hearings must permit cross-examination. Dissertation! Nonetheless, the recent attack on the practice has left schools struggling to david reed explain why they would not want to juridique utilize what the can everyone essay Court has described as the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” In June 2016, the University of Cincinnati found a student guilty of sexual assault after a hearing at juridique, which neither his accuser nor the university’s Title IX investigator appeared.
In an unintentionally comical line, the hearing chair noted the absent witnesses before asking the accused student if he had “any questions of the Title IX report.” The student, befuddled, replied, “Well, since she’s not here, I can’t really ask anything of the report.” (The panel chair did not indicate how the “report” could have answered any questions.) Cincinnati found the student guilty anyway. 1. Limitations on full cross-examination also played a role in judicial setbacks for Middlebury, George Mason, James Madison, Ohio State, Occidental, Penn State, Brandeis, Amherst, Notre Dame, and Skidmore. Finally, since 2011, more than 300 students have filed Title IX complaints with the an example of a literature Office for Civil Rights, alleging mishandling of their sexual-assault allegation by their college. OCR’s leadership seemed to welcome the complaints, which allowed Obama officials not only to inspect the individual case but all sexual-assault claims at the school in question over dissertation help a three-year period. Northwestern University professor Laura Kipnis has estimated that during the Obama years, colleges spent between $60 million and $100 million on these investigations.
If OCR finds a Title IX violation, that might lead to a loss of federal funding. This has led Harvard Law professors Jeannie Suk Gersen, Janet Halley, Elizabeth Bartholet, and Nancy Gertner to observe in a white paper submitted to OCR that universities have “strong incentives to cover letter for software assurance ensure the school stays in OCR’s good graces.” One of the earliest lawsuits after the service Obama administration’s policy shift, involving former Xavier University basketball player Dez Wells, demonstrated how an OCR investigation can affect the fairness of coursework a university inquiry. The accuser’s complaint had been referred both to dissertation help juridique Xavier’s Title IX office and the Cincinnati police. The police concluded that the for software allegation was meritless; Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph Deters later said he considered charging the help accuser with filing a false police report. Deters asked Xavier to delay its proceedings until his office completed its investigation. School officials refused. Admission! Instead, three weeks after the initial allegation, the university expelled Wells. He sued and speculated that Xavier’s haste came not from a quest for justice but instead from a desire to avoid difficulties in finalizing an agreement with OCR to resolve an unrelated complaint filed by two female Xavier students. (In recent years, OCR has entered into dozens of similar resolution agreements, which bind universities to policy changes in dissertation juridique exchange for removing the threat of an example literature review losing federal funds.) In a July 2014 ruling, Judge Arthur Spiegel observed that Xavier’s disciplinary tribunal, however “well-equipped to adjudicate questions of cheating, may have been in help service over its head with relation to ntu graduate admission an alleged false accusation of sexual assault.” Soon thereafter, the two sides settled; Wells transferred to the University of Maryland.
Ohio State, Occidental, Cornell, Middlebury, Appalachian State, USC, and Columbia have all found themselves on the losing side of court decisions arising from dissertation help service juridique, cases that originated during a time in which OCR was investigating or threatening to investigate the school. (In the Ohio State case, one university staffer testified that she didn’t know whether she had an obligation to correct a false statement by an accuser to a disciplinary panel.) Pressure from OCR can be indirect, as well. Spending With Friends! The Obama administration interpreted federal law as requiring all universities to have at dissertation juridique, least one Title IX coordinator; larger universities now employ dozens of Title IX personnel who, as the Harvard Law professors explained, “have reason to reed fear for dissertation help service, their jobs if they hold a student not responsible or if they assign a rehabilitative or restorative rather than a harshly punitive sanction.” A mid the spending essay wave of help service juridique judicial setbacks for universities, two decisions in reed particular stand out. Easily the most powerful opinion in a campus due-process case came in dissertation help service March 2016 from Judge F. Dennis Saylor. While the stereotypical campus sexual-assault allegation results from an alcohol-filled, one-night encounter between a male and a female student, a case at Brandeis University involved a long-term monogamous relationship between two male students. A bad breakup led to the accusing student’s filing the following complaint, against admission, which his former boyfriend was expected to dissertation service provide a defense: “Starting in the month of September, 2011, the Alleged violator of essay Policy had numerous inappropriate, nonconsensual sexual interactions with me. These interactions continued to occur until around May 2013.” To adjudicate, Brandeis hired a former OCR staffer, who interviewed the two students and a few of service their friends. Since the university did not hold a hearing, the investigator decided guilt or innocence on cover letter for software, her own. She treated each incident as if the two men were strangers to each other, which allowed her to determine that sexual “violence” had occurred in the relationship. The accused student, she found, sometimes looked at his boyfriend in the nude without permission and sometimes awakened his boyfriend with kisses when the juridique boyfriend wanted to stay asleep.
The university’s procedures prevented the essays about year olds student from seeing the investigator’s report, with its absurdly broad definition of juridique sexual misconduct, in preparing his appeal. Essay! “In the context of American legal culture,” Boston Globe columnist Dante Ramos later argued, denying this type of dissertation service juridique information “is crazy.” “Standard rules of evidence and other protections for the accused keep things like false accusations or mistakes by authorities from hurting innocent people.” When the letter analyst university appeal was denied, the student sued. At an October 2015 hearing to consider the university’s motion to dismiss, Saylor seemed flabbergasted at the unfairness of the school’s approach. “I don’t understand,” he observed, “how a university, much less one named after Louis Brandeis, could possibly think that that was a fair procedure to not allow the accused to see the accusation.” Brandeis’s lawyer cited pressure to conform to OCR guidance, but the judge deemed the dissertation juridique university’s procedures “closer to Salem 1692 than Boston, 2015.” The following March, Saylor issued an 89-page opinion that has been cited in essays about virtually every lawsuit subsequently filed by an accused student. “Whether someone is a ‘victim’ is a conclusion to be reached at the end of a fair process, not an assumption to be made at the beginning,” Saylor wrote. “If a college student is to be marked for dissertation help service juridique, life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and david essay, an impartial arbiter to make that decision.” Saylor concluded that Brandeis forced the accused student “to defend himself in what was essentially an help, inquisitorial proceeding that plausibly failed to an example of a provide him with a fair and reasonable opportunity to be informed of the help juridique charges and to present an adequate defense.” The student, vindicated by ntu graduate admission coursework, the ruling’s sweeping nature, then withdrew his lawsuit. He currently is dissertation help pursuing a Title IX complaint against Brandeis with OCR. Four months later, a three-judge panel of the essays about year olds Second Circuit Court of help Appeals produced an ntu graduate, opinion that lacked Saylor’s rhetorical flourish or his understanding of the help basic unfairness of the year campus Title IX process. Dissertation Help Service Juridique! But by creating a more relaxed standard for accused students to an example of a dissertation literature review make federal Title IX claims, the help Second Circuit’s decision in Doe v. Columbia carried considerable weight.
Two Columbia students who had been drinking had a brief sexual encounter at a party. More than four months later, the spending time friends accuser claimed she was too intoxicated to have consented. Her allegation came in help an atmosphere of campus outrage about the university’s allegedly insufficient toughness on sexual assault. In this setting, the accused student found Columbia’s Title IX investigator uninterested in hearing his side of the story. Essays Four! He cited witnesses who would corroborate his belief that the dissertation help service juridique accuser wasn’t intoxicated; the investigator declined to speak with them. The student was found guilty, although for reasons differing from the the american essay initial claim; the dissertation help Columbia panel ruled that he had “directed unreasonable pressure for sexual activity toward the [accuser] over a period of weeks,” leaving her unable to consent on the night in question. He received a three-semester suspension for this nebulous offense—which even his accuser deemed too harsh. He sued, and the case was assigned to cover letter for software quality Judge Jesse Furman. Furman’s opinion provided a ringing victory for dissertation help juridique, Columbia and the Obama-backed policies it used.
As Title IX litigator Patricia Hamill later observed, Furman’s “almost impossible standard” required accused students to have inside information about the spending time with friends institution’s handling of other sexual-assault claims—information they could plausibly obtain only through the legal process known as discovery, which happens at a later stage of litigation—in order to dissertation juridique survive a university’s initial motion to dismiss. Furman suggested that, to prevail, an accused student would need to show that his school treated a female student accused of sexual assault more favorably, or at least provide details about how cases against other accused students showed a pattern of bias. But federal privacy law keeps campus disciplinary hearings private, leaving most accused students with little opportunity to uncover the reed essay information before their case is dismissed. At the same time, the opinion excused virtually any degree of unfairness by juridique, the institution. An Example Dissertation Literature Review! Furman reasoned that taking “allegations of rape on campus seriously and . . . treat[ing] complainants with a high degree of sensitivity” could constitute “lawful” reasons for university unfairness toward accused students. Samantha Harris of the Foundation for juridique, Individual Rights in achieve dream essay Education detected the decision’s “immediate and nationwide impact” in several rulings against accused students.
It also played the same role in university briefs that Saylor’s Brandeis opinion did in filings by dissertation help service, accused students. The Columbia student’s lawyer, Andrew Miltenberg, appealed Furman’s ruling to the Second Circuit. Cover Letter Analyst! The stakes were high, since a ruling affirming the lower court’s reasoning would have all but foreclosed Title IX lawsuits by dissertation help service, accused students in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. But a panel of three judges, all nominated by Democratic presidents, overturned Furman’s decision. In the dream opinion’s crucial passage, Judge Pierre Leval held that a university “is not excused from liability for discrimination because the discriminatory motivation does not result from a discriminatory heart, but rather from a desire to avoid practical disadvantages that might result from unbiased action. A covered university that adopts, even temporarily, a policy of bias favoring one sex over the other in a disciplinary dispute, doing so in order to avoid liability or bad publicity, has practiced sex discrimination, notwithstanding that the motive for the discrimination did not come from juridique, ingrained or permanent bias against that particular sex.” Before the achieve the american dream essay Columbia decision, courts almost always had rebuffed Title IX pleadings from accused students. Dissertation Juridique! More recently, judges have allowed Title IX claims to proceed against cover for software quality assurance analyst, Amherst, Cornell, California–Santa Barbara, Drake, and dissertation help, Rollins. After the essay Second Circuit’s decision, Columbia settled with the accused student, sparing its Title IX decision-makers from having to testify at a trial.
James Madison was one of the few universities to dissertation help service juridique take a different course, with disastrous results. A lawsuit from an accused student survived a motion to dismiss, but the university refused to settle, allowing the student’s lawyer to depose the three school employees who had decided his client’s fate. One unintentionally revealed that he had misapplied the university’s own definition of consent. Another cited the importance of the spending time with friends accuser’s slurring words on a voicemail, thus proving her extreme intoxication on the night of the alleged assault. It was left to the accused student’s lawyer, at a deposition months after the decision had been made, to help service note that the voicemail in question actually was received on a different night. In December 2016, Judge Elizabeth Dillon, an Obama nominee, granted summary judgment to the accused student, concluding that “significant anomalies in the appeal process” violated his due-process rights under the Constitution. niversities were on the losing side of 36 due-process rulings when Obama appointee Catherine Lhamon was presiding over the Office for Civil Rights between 2013 and 2016; no record exists of ntu graduate admission her publicly acknowledging any of help juridique them.
In June 2017, however, Lhamon suddenly rejoiced that “yet another federal court” had found that students disciplined for sexual misconduct “were not denied due process.” That Fifth Circuit decision, involving two former students at the University of Houston, was an achieve the american dream essay, odd case for her to celebrate. The majority cabined its findings to the “unique facts” of the case—that the accused students likely would have been found guilty even under the fairest possible process. And the help dissent, from Judge Edith Jones, denounced the procedures championed by Lhamon and cover for software analyst, other Obama officials as “heavily weighted in favor of dissertation help service juridique finding guilt,” predicting “worse to come if appellate courts do not step in to protect students’ procedural due process right where allegations of quasi-criminal sexual misconduct arise.” At this stage, Lhamon, who now chairs the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, cannot be taken seriously when it comes to questions of admission coursework campus due process. But other defenders of the current Title IX regime have offered more substantive commentary about the university setbacks. Legal scholar Michelle Anderson was one of the few to dissertation help service even discuss the due-process decisions. “Colleges and universities do not always adjudicate allegations of sexual assault well,” she noted in a 2016 law review article defending the coursework Obama-era policies. Anderson even conceded that some colleges had denied “accused students fairness in disciplinary adjudication.” But these students sued, “and campuses are responding—as they must—when accused students prevail. So campuses face powerful legal incentives on both sides to help address campus sexual assault, and to do so fairly and impartially.” This may be true, but Anderson does not explain why wrongly accused students should bear the financial and emotional burden of inducing their colleges to four year implement fair procedures. More important, scant evidence exists that colleges have responded to the court victories of wrongly accused students by creating fairer procedures.
Some have even made it more difficult for wrongly accused students to sue. After losing a lawsuit in dissertation juridique December 2014, Brown eliminated the right of students accused of sexual assault to have “every opportunity” to present evidence. That same year, an accused student showed how Swarthmore had deviated from its own procedures in his case. The college quickly settled the lawsuit—and then added a clause to its procedures immunizing it from similar claims in the future. Swarthmore currently informs accused students that “rules of evidence ordinarily found in legal proceedings shall not be applied, nor shall any deviations from any of dream these prescribed procedures alone invalidate a decision.” Many lawsuits are still working their way through the judicial system; three cases are pending at federal appellate courts. Of the two that address substantive matters, oral arguments seemed to reveal skepticism of the dissertation help university’s position.
On July 26, a three-judge panel of the First Circuit considered a case at Boston College, where the accused student plausibly argued that someone else had committed the sexual assault (which occurred on a poorly lit dance floor). Essays About! Judges Bruce Selya and William Kayatta seemed troubled that a Boston College dean had improperly intruded on the hearing board’s deliberations. At the Sixth Circuit a few days later, Judges Richard Griffin and Amul Thapar both expressed concerns about the University of Cincinnati’s downplaying the dissertation service importance of cross-examination in campus-sex adjudications. Judge Eric Clay was quieter, but he wondered about the tension between the university’s Title IX and truth-seeking obligations. In a perfect world, academic leaders themselves would have created fairer processes without judicial intervention.
But in dream the current campus environment, such an approach is impossible. So, at least for the short term, the courts remain the best, albeit imperfect, option for students wrongly accused of sexual assault. Meanwhile, every year, young men entrust themselves and their family’s money to institutions of higher learning that are indifferent to their rights and unconcerned with the injustices to which these students might be subjected. 1 After a district court placed that finding on hold, the university appealed to the Sixth Circuit. Review of 'Terror in France' By Gilles Kepel. James Kirchick 2017-09-13. Kepel is particularly knowledgeable about the history and process of dissertation help radicalization that takes place in his nation’s heavily Muslim banlieues (the depressed housing projects ringing Paris and other major cities), and Terror in France is informed by decades of fieldwork in these volatile locales. What we have been witnessing for more than a decade, Kepel argues, is the “third wave” of an example literature global jihadism, which is dissertation help service not so much a top-down doctrinally inspired campaign (as were the 9/11 attacks, directed from afar by with friends, the oracular figure of Osama bin Laden) but a bottom-up insurgency with an “enclave-based ethnic-racial logic of violence” to it. Kepel traces the phenomenon back to 2005, a convulsive year that saw the help service juridique second-generation descendants of France’s postcolonial Muslim immigrants confront a changing socio-political landscape.
That was the essays about four year year of the greatest riots in modern French history, involving mostly young Muslim men. It was also the year that Abu Musab al-Suri, the Syrian-born Islamist then serving as al-Qaeda’s operations chief in Europe, published The Global Islamic Resistance Call . This 1,600-page manifesto combined pious imprecations against the West with do-it-yourself ingenuity, an Anarchist’s Cookbook for the Islamist set. Help Juridique! In Kepel’s words, the manifesto preached a “jihadism of proximity,” the brand of civil war later adopted by the Islamic State. It called for ceaseless, mass-casualty attacks in about four year olds Western cities—attacks which increase suspicion and help service, regulation of Muslims and, in turn, drive those Muslims into the arms of violent extremists. The third-generation jihad has been assisted by two phenomena: social-networking sites that easily and widely disseminate Islamist propaganda (thus increasing the rate of self-radicalization) and the so-called Arab Spring, which led to cover for software quality assurance analyst state collapse in Syria and Libya, providing “an exceptional site for military training and propaganda only a few hours’ flight from Europe, and at a very low cost.” Kepel’s book is not just a study of the service juridique ideology and tactics of Islamists but a sociopolitical overview of how this disturbing phenomenon fits within a country on the brink. For example, Kepel finds that jihadism is emerging in conjunction with developments such as the “end of four olds industrial society.” A downturn in work has led to an ominous situation in which a “right-wing ethnic nationalism” preying on the economically anxious has risen alongside Islamism as “parallel conduits for expressing grievances.” Filling a space left by the French Communist Party (which once brought the ethnic French working class and Arab immigrants together), these two extremes leer at each other from opposite sides of a societal chasm, signaling the potentially cataclysmic future that awaits France if both mass unemployment and Islamist terror continue undiminished. The French economy has also had a more direct inciting effect on jihadism.
Overregulated labor markets make it difficult for young Muslims to get jobs, thus exacerbating the conditions of juridique social deprivation and exclusion that make individuals susceptible to radicalization. David! The inability to tackle chronic unemployment has led to dissertation help service widespread Muslim disillusionment with the left (a disillusionment aggravated by another, often glossed over, factor: widespread Muslim opposition to the Socialist Party’s championing of same-sex marriage). Essentially, one left-wing constituency (unions) has made the unemployment of spending with another constituency (Muslim youth) the mechanism for dissertation juridique, maintaining its privileges. Kepel does not, however, cite deprivation as the sole or even main contributing factor to Islamist radicalization. One Parisian banlieue that has sent more than 80 residents to reed essay fight in Syria, he notes, has “attractive new apartment buildings” built by the state and features a mosque “constructed with the backing of the Socialist mayor.” It is also the birthplace of well-known French movie stars of Arab descent, and thus hardly a place where ambition goes to die. “The Islamophobia mantra and the victim mentality it reinforces makes it possible to rationalize a total rejection of France and a commitment to jihad by making a connection between unemployment, discrimination, and French republican values,” Kepel writes. Indeed, Kepel is refreshingly derisive of the term “Islamophobia” throughout the book, excoriating Islamists and help juridique, their fellow travelers for “substituting it for anti-Semitism as the West’s cardinal sin.” These are meaningful words coming from Kepel, a deeply learned scholar of Islam who harbors great respect for an example literature, the faith and help service, its adherents. Kepel also weaves the cover quality saga of jihadism into the ongoing “ kulturkampf within the help service juridique French left.” Arguments about Islamist terrorism demonstrate a “divorce between a secular progressive tradition” and the children of the Muslim immigrants this tradition fought to defend.
The most ironically perverse manifestation of this divorce was ISIS’s kidnapping of Didier Francois, co-founder of the civil-rights organization SOS Racisme . Kepel recognizes the ntu graduate origins of this divorce in dissertation help juridique the “red-green” alliance formed decades ago between Islamists and elements of the French intellectual left, such as Michel Foucault, a cheerleader of the Iranian revolution. Though he offers a rigorous history and analysis of the jihadist problem, Kepel is generally at a loss for solutions. He decries a complacent French elite, with its disregard for genuine expertise (evidenced by the decline in institutional academic support for of a, Islamicists and Arabists) and the narrow, relatively impenetrable way in which it perpetuates itself, chiefly with a single school (the Ecole normale superieure) that practically every French politician must attend. Despite France’s admirable republican values, this has made the process of assimilation rather difficult. But other than wishing that the public education system become more effective and inclusive at instilling republican values, Kepel provides little in the way of dissertation juridique suggestions as to david reed how France emerges from this mess. That a scholar of such erudition and humanity can do little but throw up his hands and issue a sigh of despair cannot bode well. The third-generation jihad owes as much to the political breakdown in dissertation help service juridique France as it does to the meltdown in the Middle East. Spending Time! Defeating this two-headed beast requires a new and comprehensive playbook: the West’s answer to The Global Islamic Resistance Call. That book has yet to be written.
Matthew Continetti 2017-09-13. resident Trump, in case you haven’t noticed, has a tendency to exaggerate. Nothing is “just right” or “meh” for him. Dissertation Service Juridique! Buildings, crowds, election results, and military campaigns are always outsized, gargantuan, larger, and more significant than you might otherwise assume. “People want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular,” he wrote 30 years ago in The Art of the Deal . “I call it truthful hyperbole. It’s an innocent form of exaggeration—and a very effective form of promotion.” So effective, in fact, that the press has picked up the habit.
Reporters and editors agree with the ntu graduate admission president that nothing he does is ordinary. After covering Trump for more than two years, they still can’t accept him as a run-of-the-mill politician. And while there are aspects of Donald Trump and his presidency that are, to say the least, unusual, the media seem unable to distinguish between the abnormal and significant—firing the dissertation help service juridique FBI director in can everyone achieve the midst of an investigation into dissertation service juridique one’s presidential campaign, for example—and the commonplace. Consider the fiscal deal President Trump struck with Democratic leaders in david early September. On September 6, the dissertation help service president held an Oval Office meeting with Vice President Pence, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin, and congressional leaders of both parties. He had to find a way to (a) raise the debt ceiling, (b) fund the federal government, and (c) spend money on hurricane relief. The problem is that a bloc of ntu graduate admission House Republicans won’t vote for (a) unless the help increase is quality assurance analyst accompanied by significant budget cuts, which interferes with (b) and dissertation help, (c). To raise the debt ceiling, then, requires Democratic votes. And the debt ceiling must be raised. “There is zero chance—no chance—we will not raise the debt ceiling,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in August. The meeting went like this. First House Speaker Paul Ryan asked for an 18-month increase in the debt ceiling so Republicans wouldn’t have to spending with vote again on the matter until after the midterm elections.
Democrats refused. Dissertation Juridique! The bargaining continued until Ryan asked for a six-month increase. The Democrats remained stubborn. Quality Assurance! So Trump, always willing to kick a can down the dissertation help service juridique road, interrupted Mnuchin to offer a three-month increase, a continuing resolution that will keep the government open through December, and about $8 billion in hurricane money. The Democrats said yes. That, anyway, is what happened. But the media are not satisfied to report what happened.
They want—they need —to tell you what it means. And what does it mean? Well, they aren’t really sure. But it’s something big. It’s something spectacular. About Year Olds! For example:
1. “Trump Bypasses Republicans to Strike Deal on dissertation help, Debt Limit and Harvey Aid” was the headline of a story for the New York Times by Peter Baker, Thomas Kaplan, and Michael D. Shear. “The deal to keep the government open and spending time friends, paying its debts until Dec. Help Juridique! 15 represented an extraordinary public turn for ntu graduate coursework, the president, who has for much of his term set himself up on the right flank of the Republican Party,” their article began. Fair enough. Dissertation Help Juridique! But look at reed essay, how they import speculation and opinion into the following sentence: “But it remained unclear whether Mr. Trump’s collaboration with Democrats foreshadowed a more sustained shift in strategy by help juridique, a president who has presented himself as a master dealmaker or amounted to just a one-time instinctual reaction of time friends essay a mercurial leader momentarily eager to poke his estranged allies.” 2. “The decision was one of the most fascinating and mysterious moves he’s made with Congress during eight months in office,” reported Jeff Zeleny, Dana Bash, Deirdre Walsh, and Jeremy Diamond for dissertation service juridique, CNN. Thanks for sharing! 3. “Trump budget deal gives GOP full-blown Stockholm Syndrome,” read the headline of Tina Nguyen’s piece for david essay, Vanity Fair . Dissertation Help! “Donald Trump’s unexpected capitulation to new best buds ‘Chuck and essays about four, Nancy’ has thrown the Grand Old Party into a frenzy as Republicans search for explanations—and scapegoats.” 4. “For Conservatives, Trump’s Deal with Democrats Is Nightmare Come True,” read the headline for a New York Times article by Jeremy W. Peters and Maggie Haberman. “It is the scenario that President Trump’s most conservative followers considered their worst nightmare, and on Wednesday it seemed to come true: The deal-making political novice, whose ideology and loyalty were always fungible, cut a deal with Democrats.” 5. “Trump sides with Democrats on fiscal issues, throwing Republican plans into chaos,” read the dissertation help service Washington Post headline the day after the about olds deal was announced. “The president’s surprise stance upended sensitive negotiations over the debt ceiling and other crucial policy issues this fall and further imperiled his already tenuous relationships with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan.” Yes, the negotiations were upended. Then they made a deal.
6. “Although elected as a Republican last year,” wrote Peter Baker of the Times , “Mr. Trump has shown in dissertation the nearly eight months in office that he is, in many ways, the about year first independent to hold the presidency since the advent of the two-party system around the help time of the Civil War.” The title of Baker’s news analysis: “Bound to No Party, Trump Upends 150 Years of Two-Party Rule.” One hundred and fifty years? Why not 200? The journalistic rule of thumb used to be that an article describing a political, social, or cultural trend requires at least three examples. Not while covering Trump. Spending With Friends! If Trump does something, anything, you should feel free to inflate its importance beyond all recognition. And stuff your “reporting” with all sorts of dramatic adjectives and frightening nouns: fascinating , mysterious , unexpected , extraordinary , nightmare , chaos , frenzy , and scapegoats . It’s like a Vince Flynn thriller come to life. The case for service juridique, the significance of the budget deal would be stronger if there were a consensus about whom it helped. There isn’t one. At first the press assumed Democrats had won. Reed! “Republicans left the Oval Office Wednesday stunned,” reported Rachael Bade, Burgess Everett, and dissertation juridique, Josh Dawsey of ntu graduate admission Politico . Another trio of Politico reporters wrote, “In the aftermath, Republicans seethed privately and distanced themselves publicly from the dissertation help juridique deal.” Republicans were “stunned,” reported Kristina Peterson, Siobhan Hughes, and Louise Radnofsky of the Wall Street Journal . “Meet the swamp: Donald Trump punts September agenda to December after meeting with Congress,” read the headline of Charlie Spiering’s Breitbart story. By the spending time essay following week, though, these very outlets had decided the GOP was looking pretty good. Dissertation Help! “Trump’s deal with Democrats bolsters Ryan—for now,” read the Politico headline on September 11. “McConnell: No New Debt Ceiling Vote until ‘Well into 2018,’” reported the Washington Post . “At this point…picking a fight with Republican leaders will only help him,” wrote Gerald Seib in the Wall Street Journal . “Trump has long warned that he would work with Democrats, if necessary, to fulfill his campaign promises.
And Wednesday’s deal is a sign that he intends to follow through on that threat,” wrote Breitbart’s Joel Pollak. The sensationalism, the four year olds conflicting interpretations, the visceral language is dizzying. We have so many reporters chasing the same story that each feels compelled to gussy up a quotidian budget negotiation until it resembles the Ribbentrop–Molotov pact, and none feel it necessary to apply to service juridique their own reporting the scrutiny and incredulity they apply to an example dissertation review Trump. The truth is that no one knows what this agreement portends. Dissertation Help Service Juridique! Nor is it the job of a reporter to divine the meaning of current events like an augur of Rome. Sometimes a cigar is essays about year just a cigar. Dissertation Help Service! And a deal is just a deal. Remembering something wonderful.
Terry Teachout 2017-09-13. Not surprisingly, many well-established performers were left in the lurch by the rise of the achieve the american essay new media. Moreover, some vaudevillians who, like Fred Allen, had successfully reinvented themselves for radio were unable to make the dissertation help service transition to TV. But a handful of exceptionally talented performers managed to move from vaudeville to radio to TV, and none did it with more success than Jack Benny, whose feigned stinginess, scratchy violin playing, slightly effeminate demeanor, and preternaturally exact comic timing made him one of the world’s most beloved performers. After establishing himself in vaudeville, he became the star of a comedy series, The Jack Benny Program , that aired continuously, first on radio and then TV, from 1932 until 1965. Save for review, Bob Hope, no other comedian of his time was so popular. With the demise of nighttime network radio as an entertainment medium, the 931 weekly episodes of The Jack Benny Program became the province of comedy obsessives—and because Benny’s TV series was filmed in black-and-white, it is dissertation service juridique no longer shown in syndication with any regularity.
And while he also made Hollywood films, some of which were box-office hits, only one, Ernst Lubitsch’s To Be or Not to Be (1942), is today seen on can everyone achieve the american essay, TV other than sporadically. Nevertheless, connoisseurs of comedy still regard Benny, who died in dissertation help 1974, as a giant, and numerous books, memoirs, and articles have been published about his life and art. Achieve Dream! Most recently, Kathryn H. Fuller-Seeley, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin, has brought out dissertation help service juridique, Jack Benny and can everyone the american dream, the Golden Age of Radio Comedy , the first book-length primary-source academic study of The Jack Benny Program and its star. 1 Fuller-Seeley’s genuine appreciation for Benny’s work redeems her anachronistic insistence on viewing it through the fashionable prism of gender- and race-based theory, and her book, though sober-sided to the point of occasional starchiness, is often quite illuminating. Most important of all, off-the-air recordings of 749 episodes of the radio version of juridique The Jack Benny Program survive in whole or part and can easily be downloaded from the Web. As a result, it is possible for people not yet born when Benny was alive to hear for an example dissertation review, themselves why he is still remembered with admiration and affection—and why one specific aspect of his performing persona continues to fascinate close observers of the American scene. B orn Benjamin Kubelsky in Chicago in service 1894, Benny was the son of essays four year Eastern European emigres (his father was from Poland, his mother from Lithuania). He started studying violin at six and had enough talent to dissertation juridique pursue a career in achieve dream music, but his interests lay elsewhere, and by the time he was a teenager, he was working in dissertation service juridique vaudeville as a comedian who played the violin as part of his act.
Over time he developed into achieve the american a “monologist,” the period term for what we now call a stand-up comedian, and he began appearing in films in 1929 and on network radio three years after that. Radio comedy, like silent film, is now an dissertation juridique, obsolete art form, but the program formats that it fostered in the ’20s and ’30s all survived into the era of TV, and some of them flourish to this day. One, episodic situation comedy, was developed in large part by review, Jack Benny and his collaborators. Benny and Harry Conn, his first full-time writer, turned his weekly series, which started out as a variety show, into a weekly half-hour playlet featuring a regular cast of characters augmented by help juridique, guest stars. Such playlets, relying as they did on a setting that was repeated from week to week, were easier to write than the dissertation free-standing sketches favored by dissertation help service juridique, Allen, Hope, and other ex-vaudevillians, and by the late ’30s, the sitcom had become a staple of radio comedy. The process, as documented by Fuller-Seeley, was a gradual one. The Jack Benny Program never broke entirely with the variety format, continuing to feature both guest stars (some of whom, like Ronald Colman, ultimately became semi-regular members of the show’s rotating ensemble of players) and songs sung by Dennis Day, a tenor who joined the about four year olds cast in 1939.
Nor was it the first radio situation comedy: Amos Andy , launched in 1928, was a soap-opera-style daily serial that also featured regular characters. Nevertheless, it was Benny who perfected the form, and service juridique, his own character would become the prototype for countless later sitcom stars. The show’s pivotal innovation was to the american dream essay turn Benny and the other cast members into service fictionalized versions of themselves—they were the stars of a radio show called “The Jack Benny Program.” Sadye Marks, Benny’s wife, played Mary Livingstone, his sharp-tongued secretary, with three other characters added as the david self-reflexive concept took shape. Don Wilson, the stout, genial announcer, came on board in 1934. Dissertation Service Juridique! He was followed in of a review 1936 by Phil Harris, Benny’s roguish bandleader, and, in dissertation help service juridique 1939, by Day, Harris’s simple-minded vocalist. To this team was added a completely fictional character, Rochester Van Jones, Benny’s raspy-voiced, outrageously impertinent black valet, played by an example dissertation literature review, Eddie Anderson, who joined the cast in 1938. As these five talented performers coalesced into a tight-knit ensemble, the jokey, vaudeville-style sketch comedy of the early episodes metamorphosed into help juridique sitcom-style scripts that portrayed their offstage lives, as well as the ntu graduate admission making of the dissertation juridique show itself. Of A! Scarcely any conventional jokes were told, nor did Benny’s writers employ the topical and political references in which Allen and Hope specialized.
Instead, the show’s humor arose almost entirely from the dissertation help close interplay of character and situation. Benny was not solely responsible for the creation of this format, which was forged by can everyone essay, Conn and perfected by his successors. Instead, he doubled as the star and producer—or, to use the modern term, show runner—closely supervising the writing of the help juridique scripts and directing the performances of the other cast members. Letter For Software Quality Assurance Analyst! In addition, he and dissertation help service juridique, Conn turned the character of Jack Benny from a sophisticated vaudeville monologist into the hapless butt of the show’s humor, a vain, sexually inept skinflint whose character flaws were ceaselessly twitted by his colleagues, who in turn were given most of the analyst biggest laugh lines. This latter innovation was a direct reflection of Benny’s real-life personality. Legendary for his voluble appreciation of other comedians, he was content to help service juridique respond to the wisecracking of his fellow cast members with exquisitely well-timed interjections like “Well!” and “Now, cut that out,” knowing that the comic spotlight would remain focused on the man of whom they were making fun and secure in the knowledge that his own comic personality was strong enough to letter quality let them shine without eclipsing him in help the process. And with each passing season, the fictional personalities of Benny and his colleagues became ever more firmly implanted in the minds of their listeners, thus allowing the writers to get laughs merely by alluding to literature their now-familiar traits. At the same time, Benny and his writers never stooped to help coasting on their familiarity. Even the funniest of the “cheap jokes” that were their stock-in-trade were invariably embedded in spending with carefully honed dramatic situations that heightened their effectiveness. A celebrated case in dissertation point is the best-remembered laugh line in the history of The Jack Benny Program , heard in a 1948 episode in which a burglar holds Benny up on the street. “Your money or your life,” the burglar says—to which Jack replies, after a very long pause, “I’m thinking it over!” What makes this line so funny is, of course, our awareness of david reed essay Benny’s stinginess, reinforced by a decade and a half of constant yet subtly varied repetition. What is juridique not so well remembered is that the essays about four line is heard toward the end of an juridique, episode that aired shortly after Ronald Colman won an Oscar for his performance in A Double Life . Inspired by david, this real-life event, the service writers concocted an elaborately plotted script in which Benny talks Colman (who played his next-door neighbor on an example review, the show) into letting him borrow the Oscar to show to Rochester.
It is on his way home from this errand that Benny is held up, and the burglar not only robs him of his money but also steals the statuette, a situation that was resolved to equally explosive comic effect in the course of juridique two subsequent episodes. No mere joke-teller could have performed such dramatically complex scripts week after week with anything like Benny’s effectiveness. Essays Four! The secret of juridique The Jack Benny Program was that its star, fully aware that he was not “being himself” but playing a part, did so with an ntu graduate coursework, actor’s skill. This was what led Ernst Lubitsch to cast him in dissertation service juridique To Be or Not to Be , in which he plays a mediocre Shakespearean tragedian, a character broadly related to but still quite different from the one who appeared on his own radio show. As Lubitsch explained to Benny, who was skeptical about his ability to carry off the essays four year olds part: A clown—he is a performer what is doing funny things. A comedian—he is a performer what is saying funny things. But you, Jack, you are an actor, you are an actor playing the part of juridique a comedian and this you are doing very well. To Be or Not to Be also stands out from the rest of Benny’s work because he plays an identifiably Jewish character.
The Jack Benny character that he played on radio and TV, by contrast, was never referred to or explicitly portrayed as Jewish. To be sure, most listeners were in no doubt of his Jewishness, and not merely because Benny made no attempt in essay real life to dissertation help service conceal his ethnicity, of friends essay which he was by all accounts proud. The Jack Benny Program was written by Jews, and the ego-puncturing insults with which their scripts were packed, as well as the schlemiel-like aspect of Benny’s “fall guy” character, were quintessentially Jewish in style. As Benny explained in a 1948 interview cited by Fuller-Seeley: The humor of my program is this: I’m a big shot, see?
I’m fast-talking. I’m a smart guy. I’m boasting about how marvelous I am. I’m a marvelous lover. I’m a marvelous fiddle player. Then, five minutes after I start shooting off my mouth, my cast makes a shmo out of me. Even so, his avoidance of specific Jewish identification on the air is noteworthy precisely because his character was a miser. At a time when overt anti-Semitism was still common in America, it is remarkable that Benny’s comic persona was based in juridique large part on an anti-Semitic stereotype—yet one that seems not to have inspired any anti-Semitic attacks on Benny himself. When, in 1945, his writers came up with the idea of an “I Can’t Stand Jack Benny Because . . . ” write-in campaign, they received 270,000 entries.
Only three made mention of his Jewishness. As for the winning entry, submitted by spending time with essay, a California lawyer, it says much about what insulated Benny from such attacks: “He fills the juridique air with boasts and brags / And obsolete, obnoxious gags / The way he plays his violin / Is music’s most obnoxious sin / His cowardice alone, indeed, / Is matched by his obnoxious greed / And all the things that he portrays / Show up MY OWN obnoxious ways.” It is clear that Benny’s foibles were seen by his listeners not as particular but universal, just as there was no harshness in the razzing of his fellow cast members, who very clearly loved the time with friends Benny character in spite of his myriad flaws. So, too, did the American people. Several years after his TV series was cancelled, a corporation that was considering using him as a spokesman commissioned a national poll to find out how popular he was. It learned that only service juridique 3 percent of the respondents disliked him. Therein lay Benny’s triumph: He won total acceptance from the American public and did so by embodying a Jewish stereotype from which the sting of prejudice had been leached. Far from being a self-hating whipping boy for anti-Semites, he turned himself into WASP America’s Jewish uncle, preposterous yet lovable. W hen the bottom fell out of network radio, Benny negotiated the move to TV without a hitch, debuting on the small screen in 1950 and bringing the radio version of The Jack Benny Program to a close five years later, making it one of the about very last radio comedy series to shut up shop. Even after his weekly TV series was finally canceled by CBS in 1965, he continued to star in well-received one-shot specials on NBC.
But Benny’s TV appearances, for help service juridique, all their charm, were never quite equal in quality to his radio work, which is why he clung to can everyone the american dream essay the radio version of The Jack Benny Program until network radio itself went under: Better than anyone else, he knew how good the show had been. For the rest of his life, he lived off the help service juridique accumulated comic capital built up by 21 years of weekly radio broadcasts. Now, at ntu graduate, long last, he belongs to the ages, and The Jack Benny Program is a museum piece. Yet it remains hugely influential, albeit at one or more removes from the original. From The Dick Van Dyke Show and The Danny Thomas Show to Seinfeld , Everybody Loves Raymond , and The Larry Sanders Show , every ensemble-cast sitcom whose central character is dissertation service juridique a fictionalized version of its star is based on can everyone achieve the american essay, Benny’s example. And now that the dissertation help ubiquity of the Web has made the radio version of his series readily accessible for the first time, anyone willing to ntu graduate make the dissertation service modest effort necessary to seek it out is in a position to time with discover that The Jack Benny Program , six decades after it left the air, is still as wonderfully, benignly funny as it ever was, a monument to the talent of the man who, more than anyone else, made it so.
Review of 'The Transferred Life of George Eliot' By Philip Davis. Thomas L. Jeffers 2017-09-13. The Transferred Life of George Eliot. Not that there’s any danger these theoretically protesting students would have read George Eliot’s works—not even the short one, Silas Marner (1861), which in dissertation help service juridique an earlier day was assigned to high schoolers. I must admit I didn’t find my high-school reading of Silas Marner a pleasant experience—sports novels for boys like John R. Tunis’s The Kid from reed essay, Tomkinsville were inadequate preparation. I must confess, too, that when I was in graduate school, determined to study 17th-century English verse, my reaction to the suggestion that I should also read Middlemarch (1871–72) was “ What?! An 800-page novel by the guy who wrote Silas Marner ?” A friend patiently explained that “the guy” was actually Mary Ann Evans, born in 1819, died in 1880. Juridique! Partly because she was living in sin with the literary jack-of-all-trades George Henry Lewes (legally and irrevocably bound to his estranged wife), she adopted “George Eliot” as a protective pseudonym when, in her 1857 debut, she published Scenes from Clerical Life . I did, many times over and with awe and delight, go on to read Middlemarch and the seven other novels, often in achieve dream essay order to teach them to college students. Students have become less and help juridique, less receptive over the years. Forget modern-day objections to George Eliot’s complex political or religious views. Adam Bede (1859) and The Mill on the Floss (1860) were too hefty, and the triple-decked Middlemarch and Deronda , even if I set aside three weeks for them, rarely got finished.
The middle 20th century was perhaps a more a propitious time for appreciating George Eliot, Henry James, and other 19th-century English and American novelists. Essays About Year! Influential teachers like F.R. Leavis at help juridique, Cambridge and Lionel Trilling at Columbia were then working hard to persuade students that the study of literature, not just poetry and ntu graduate admission, drama but also fiction, matters both to juridique their personal lives—the development of their sensibility or character—and to their wider society. The “moral imagination” that created Middlemarch enriches our minds by essays about four, dramatizing the complications—the frequent blurring of juridique good and evil—in our lives. Great novels help us cope with ambiguities and spending time essay, make us more tolerant of help one another. Many of Leavis’s and Trilling’s students became teachers themselves, and for several decades the feeling of cultural urgency was sustained. Time Friends! In the 1970s, though, between the help juridique leftist emphasis on literature as “politics by other means” and spending time with essay, the deconstructionist denial of the possibility of any knowledge, literary or otherwise, independent of political power, the high seriousness of dissertation service Leavis and Trilling began to fade. The study of George Eliot and her life has gone through many stages. Directly after her death came the sanitized, hagiographic “life and letters” by J.W. Cross, the much younger man she married after Lewes’s death.
Gladstone called it “a Reticence in three volumes.” The three volumes helped spark, if they didn’t cause, the ntu graduate admission coursework long reaction against the Victorian sages generally that culminated in the dismissively satirical work of the Bloomsbury biographer and service juridique, critic Lytton Strachey in dissertation literature review his immensely influential Eminent Victorians (1916). Help Juridique! Strachey’s mistreatment of his forbears was, with regard to George Eliot at least, tempered almost immediately by Virginia Woolf. It was Woolf who in 1919 provocatively said that Middlemarch had been “the first English novel for david essay, adults.” Eventually, the critical tide against George Eliot was decisively reversed in the ’40s by Joan Bennett and Leavis, who made the inarguable case for her genuine and lasting achievement. That period of correction culminated in the 1960s with Gordon S. Haight’s biography and with interpretive studies by Barbara Hardy and W.J. Harvey. Books on George Eliot over the last four decades have largely been written by specialists for specialists—on her manuscripts or working notes, and on juridique, her affiliations with the scientists, social historians, and competing novelists of her day. The same is true, only more so, of the books written, with George Eliot as the ostensible subject, to promote deconstructionist or feminist agendas.
Biographies have done a better job appealing to the common reader, not least because the woman’s own story is letter inherently compelling. The question right now is whether a book combining biographical and interpretive insight—one “pitched,” as publishers like to say, not just at dissertation help juridique, experts but at the common reader—is past praying for. Philip Davis, a Victorian scholar and an editor at Oxford University Press, hopes not. His The Transferred Life of ntu graduate George Eliot —transferred, that is, from her own experience into her letters, journals, essays, and novels, and dissertation help service juridique, beyond them into us—deserves serious attention. Davis is conscious that George Eliot called biographies of writers “a disease of English literature,” both overeager to discover scandals and too inclined to substitute day-to-day travels, relationships, dealings with publishers and so on, for critical attention to the books those writers wrote.
Davis therefore devotes himself to George Eliot’s writing. Alas, he presumes rather too much knowledge on the reader’s part of the day-to-day as charted in Haight’s marvelous life. Admission! (A year-by-year chronology at the front of the book would have helped even his fellow Victorianists.) As for George Eliot’s writing, Davis is determined to refute “what has been more or less said . . . in the schools of service juridique theory for spending with friends, the last 40 years—that 19th-century realism is conservatively bland and unimaginative, bourgeois and parochial, not truly art at all.” His argument for service, the richness, breadth, and essays about four year olds, art of George Eliot’s realism—her factual and dissertation service, sympathetic depiction of poor and middling people, without omitting a candid representation of the rich—is most convincing. What looms largest, though, is the realist, the woman herself—the Mary Ann Evans who, from the letter quality assurance analyst letters to dissertation help the novels, became first Marian Evans the translator and essayist and then later “her own greatest character”: George Eliot the novelist. Davis insists that “the meaning of that person”—not merely the voice of her omniscient narrators but the omnipresent imagination that created the whole show—“has not yet exhausted its influence nor the larger future life she should have had, and ntu graduate coursework, may still have, in the world.” The transference of George Eliot’s experience into her fiction is unquestionable: In The Mill on the Floss , for example, Mary Ann is Maggie, and juridique, her brother Isaac is cover letter assurance Tom Tulliver. Davis knows that a better word might be transmutation, as George Eliot had, in Henry James’s words, “a mind possessed,” for “the creations which brought her renown were of the incalculable kind, shaped themselves in mystery, in some intellectual back-shop or secret crucible, and were as little as possible implied in the aspect of her life.” No data-accumulating biographer, even the dissertation help service juridique most exhaustive, can account for for software analyst, that “incalculable . Dissertation Service! . . mystery.” Which is why Davis, like a good teacher, gives us exercises in “close reading.” He pauses to consider how a George Eliot sentence balances or turns on an easy-to-skip-over word or phrase—the balance or turn often representing a moment when the novelist looks at what’s on the underside of the cards. George Eliot’s style is cover quality assurance subtle because her theme is subtle. Take D.H. Dissertation Service Juridique! Lawrence’s favorite heroine, the of a review adolescent Maggie Tulliver.
The external event in dissertation The Mill on the Floss may be the girl’s impulsive cutting off her unruly hair to spite her nagging aunts, or the young woman’s drifting down the river with a superficially attractive but truly impossible boyfriend. But the real “action” is Maggie’s internal self-blame and self-assertion. Dissertation Literature! No Victorian novelist was better than George Eliot at tracing the help juridique psychological development of, say, a husband and wife who realize they married each other for shallow reasons, are unhappy, and now must deal with the an example dissertation literature ordinary necessities of balancing the domestic budget—Lydgate and Rosamund in Middlemarch —or, in the same novel, the religiously inclined Dorothea’s mistaken marriage to the old scholar Casaubon. That mistake precipitates not merely disenchantment and an unconscious longing for dissertation help service juridique, love with someone else, but (very finely) a quest for a religious explanation of and admission, guide through her quandary. It’s the religio-philosophical side of George Eliot about which Davis is service juridique strongest—and weakest. Her central theological idea, if one may simplify, was that the God of the Bible didn’t exist “out there” but was a projection of the imagination of the people who wrote it. Jesus wasn’t, in Davis’s characterization of david reed essay her view, “the impervious divine, but [a man who] shed tears and suffered,” and help, died feeling forsaken. “This deep acceptance of so-called weakness was what most moved Marian Evans in analyst her Christian inheritance. It was what God was for.” That is, the character of dissertation Jesus, and the dramatic play between him and with friends essay, his Father, expressed the human emotions we and dissertation help, George Eliot are all too familiar with. The story helps reconcile us to what is, finally, inescapable suffering.
George Eliot came to letter for software assurance analyst this demythologized understanding not only of Judaism and Christianity but of all religions through her contact first with a group of intellectuals who lived near Coventry, then with two Germans she translated: David Friedrich Strauss, whose 1,500-page Life of Jesus Critically Examined (1835–36) was for her a slog, and Ludwig Feuerbach, whose Essence of Christianity (1841) was for dissertation help service, her a joy. Also, in the search for the universal morality that Strauss and four, Feuerbach believed Judaism and dissertation, Christianity expressed mythically, there was Spinoza’s utterly non-mythical Ethics (1677). It was seminal for her—offering, as Davis says, “the intellectual origin for freethinking criticism of the Bible and for dream essay, the replacement of religious superstition and dogmatic theology by pure philosophic reason.” She translated it into English, though her version did not appear until 1981. I wish Davis had left it there, but he takes it too far. He devotes more than 40 pages—a tenth of the dissertation juridique whole book—to her three translations, taking them as a mother lode of ideational gold whose tailings glitter throughout her fiction. These 40 pages are followed by 21 devoted to Herbert Spencer, the Victorian hawker of theories-of-everything (his 10-volume System of Synthetic Philosophy addresses biology, psychology, sociology, and ethics).
She threw herself at the feet of this intellectual huckster, and though he rebuffed her painfully amorous entreaties, she never ceased revering him. About Four Year Olds! Alas, Spencer was a stick—the kind of philosopher who was incapable of emotion. And she was his intellectual superior in every way. The chapter is largely unnecessary. The book comes back to life when Davis turns to George Henry Lewes, the man who gave Mary Ann Evans the confidence to become George Eliot—perhaps the greatest act of help service loving mentorship in all of literature. Like many prominent Victorians, Lewes dabbled in all the arts and sciences, publishing highly readable accounts of them for a general audience. His range was as wide as Spencer’s, but his personality and writing had an irrepressible verve that Spencer could only have envied. Dissertation Literature Review! Lewes was a sort Stephen Jay Gould yoked to Daniel Boorstin, popularizing other people’s findings and concepts, and coming up with a few of service his own. He regarded his Sea-Side Studies (1860) as “the book . . . which was to me the most unalloyed delight,” not least because Marian, whom he called Polly, had helped gather the data. She told a friend “There is so much happiness condensed in it! Such scrambles over rocks, and peeping into spending with friends clear pool [sic], and strolls along the pure sands, and fresh air mingling with fresh thoughts.” In his remarkably intelligent 1864 biography of Goethe, Lewes remarks that the poet “knew little of the companionship of two souls striving in emulous spirit of loving rivalry to become better, to become wiser, teaching each other to soar.” Such a companionship Lewes and help service juridique, George Eliot had in spades, and some of Davis’s best passages describe it.
Regrettably, Davis also offers many passages well below the can everyone the american standard of dissertation service juridique his best—needlessly repeating an already established point or obfuscating the obvious. Still, The Transferred Lives is the an example of a most formidably instructive, and certainly complete, life-and-works treatment of George Eliot we have. Win two free tickets to help service juridique Commentary’s roast of can everyone achieve the american dream Jonah Goldberg! Click Here.